We are initially sending this Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy to our shareholders on or about March 29, 2018.26, 2021. The requirement for a quorum at the meeting is the presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. There is no provision for cumulative voting.
The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of our Board of Directors (our “Board”) for use at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the time and place set forth in the accompanying notice. We will pay all costs of soliciting proxies. We will solicit proxies primarily by mail. In addition to solicitation by mail, our officers, directors and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, facsimile and electronic transmissions, for which such persons will receive no additional compensation. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to solicit proxies at a fee estimated at $10,000,$11,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. We will reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy material to beneficial owners of our Common Stock.
The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to verify your vote through the use of a unique voter control number that is provided on each proxy card. The procedures also allow you to vote your shares and to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Please see your proxy card for specific instructions.
If you hold shares through a brokerage firm, bank or other custodian, you may vote via the Internet or by telephone only if the custodian offers that option.
If you are a shareholder of record, and you vote by proxy by mail, the Internet or telephone, you may later revoke your proxy instructions by:
If you have shares held through a brokerage firm, bank or other custodian, and you vote by proxy, you may later revoke your proxy instructions only by informing the custodian in accordance with any procedures it sets forth.
Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation divides our Board into three classes, each consisting as nearly as possible of one-third of the members of the whole Board. There are currently three directors in Class I and four directors in each of each class.Classes II and III. The members of each class serve for three years following their election, with one class being elected each year.
In accordance with our Bylaws, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in an uncontested election of directors, any director nominee who does not receive a “for” vote by a majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote and actually voting on the matter shall promptly tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board, subject to acceptance by the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board with respect to the director’s resignation and the Board will consider the recommendation and take appropriate action within 120 days from the date of the certification of the election results. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” marked on proxy cards will not be counted in the election.
The Board has determined that Ms. Goodwin is qualified to serve on our Board based on her considerable experience as an executive officer, particularly with operational and financial experience, as well as her accounting background. Ms. Goodwin’s significant operational and financial background, including over 2025 years of experience in the oil and gas products and services industry, allows her to provide valuable contributions to our Board.
The Board has determined that Mr. Collins is qualified to serve on our Board based on his substantial prior experience as a member of our Board and his thorough knowledge regarding Oceaneering and its businesses, which he gained through his years of service as a member of our executive management team, as well as through his prior service on our Board. Mr. Collins has extensive knowledge of the oil and gas industry. Including his service on our Board, Mr. Collins has over 40 years of experience with companies engaged in oilfield-related or other energy-related businesses.
The Board has determined that Mr. Reinhardsen is qualified to serve on our Board based on his extensive experience in, and knowledge of, the subsea oilfield services industry, his involvement with renewable energy, his international perspective and his experience as a director of various other public companies. Including his service on our Board, Mr. Reinhardsen has significant financial and operational expertise and experience.experience spanning over 35 years in engineering-, construction- and energy-related businesses.
The Board has determined that Mr. Larson is qualified to serve on our Board based on his in-depth knowledge regarding our business, derived from his service as a member of our executive management team, service as a public company director for over six years and over 25 years of experience in the oilfield services industry. Mr. Larson is a member
The Board has determined that Mr. McEvoy is qualified to serve on our Board based on his thorough knowledge of Oceaneering and its businesses, which he gained through his years of service in each of our five business segments and as a member of our executive management team, as well as through his prior service on our Board.Board and as an outside director of a publicly traded company in the construction industry. Mr. McEvoy has over 40 years of experience in offshore, diving and other subsea and marine-related activities, primarily in oilfield-related areas, with significant international exposure.
Mr. Murphy 58, has since 2010, been Chief Executive Officer and chairman of the board of directors of Cadence Bancorporation and Chief Executive Officer of Cadence Bancorp, LLC, which formed Cadence Bank inits predecessors since 2009. Cadence Bancorporation is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas.From 1990 to 2009, Mr. Murphy previously was employed by Amegy Bank of Texas, from 1990 to 2009, where he served in senior leadership roles, including as Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2009 and as a director of that bank from 1994 to 2009. Within the past five years, Mr. Murphy has also serves as a director of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, the general partner of Natural Resource Partners L.P., and as a director of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. He served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas – Houston Branch from 2009 through 2015.to 2015 and as a director of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. from 2008 to November 2018. Mr. Murphy has been a director of Oceaneeringthe general partner of Natural Resource Partners L.P. since August 2012. He is chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.March 2018.
The Board has determined that Mr. Murphy is qualified to serve on our Board based on his considerable experience as an executive officer and director of both privately owned and publicly traded companies, particularly financial institutions. Mr. Murphy’s financial background, including over 35 years of business and entrepreneurial experience in the financial services industry, allows him to provide valuable contributions to our Board. Including his service on our Board, Mr. Murphy has over 20 years of experience as a director of publicly owned companies.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 21, 201817, 2021 by each director and nominee for director, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement and all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each individual named has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares shown.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Number of
Shares (1) | | Number of
Shares Underlying
Restricted Stock
Units (2) | | Total (3) |
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 13,311 |
| | 31,816 |
| | 45,127 |
|
| William B. Berry | | 18,000 |
| | — |
| | 18,000 |
|
| T. Jay Collins | | 37,452 |
| | — |
| | 37,452 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | 16,551 |
| | 35,253 |
| | 51,804 |
|
| Deanna L. Goodwin | | 8,000 |
| | — |
| | 8,000 |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 44,790 |
| | 58,545 |
| | 103,335 |
|
| John R. Huff | | 110,196 |
| | — |
| | 110,196 |
|
| Roderick A. Larson | | 29,555 |
| | 132,233 |
| | 161,788 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | 13,840 |
| | 29,298 |
| | 43,138 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | 173,670 |
| | 71,055 |
| | 244,725 |
|
| Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | 23,000 |
| | — |
| | 23,000 |
|
| Jon Erik Reinhardsen | | 18,000 |
| | — |
| | 18,000 |
|
| Steven A. Webster | | 22,000 |
| | — |
| | 22,000 |
|
| All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons) | | 611,511 |
| | 442,267 |
| | 1,053,778 |
|
| |
(1) | There are no outstanding stock options held by any of our directors or executive officers. Includes the following shares granted in 2018 pursuant to restricted stock award agreements, as to which the recipient has sole voting power and no dispositive power: Mr. Berry – 8,000; Mr. Collins – 8,000; Ms. Goodwin – 8,000; Mr. Huff – 13,000; Mr. McEvoy – 8,000; Mr. Murphy – 8,000; Mr. Reinhardsen – 8,000; Mr. Webster – 8,000; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 69,000. Also includes the following share equivalents, which are fully vested but are held in trust pursuant to the Oceaneering Retirement Investment Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), as to which the indicated persons have the right to direct the plan trustee on how to vote: Mr. Barrett – 1,635; Mr. Curtis – 10,865; Mr. Hewlett – 286; Mr. Lawrence – 2,039; Mr. McEvoy – 31,739; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 59,556. At withdrawal, the share equivalents in the 401(k) Plan are to be settled in shares of Common Stock. Also includes 1,620 shares as to which one of our executive officers has shared voting and dispositive powers; however, there are no shares over which any of our directors or the Named Executive Officers has such powers. The beneficial ownership of (a) each director and executive officer represents 0.2% or less of the outstanding Common Stock and (b) all directors and executive officers as a group represents 0.6% of the outstanding Common Stock. |
| |
(2) | Includes shares of Common Stock that are represented by restricted stock units of Oceaneering that are credited to the accounts of certain individuals and are subject to vesting. The individuals have no voting or investment power over these restricted stock units. |
| |
(3) | The indicated shares of Common Stock and Common Stock underlying restricted stock units of (a) each director and executive officer represent 0.2% or less of the outstanding Common Stock and (b) all directors and executive officers as a group represent 1.1% of the outstanding Common Stock. |
Listed below are the only persons who, to our knowledge, may be deemed to be beneficial owners as of March 21, 201817, 2021 of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. This information is based on beneficial ownership reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership | | | Percent
of Class (1) |
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055 | | 16,991,903 | (2) | | 17.1 | % |
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355 | | 10,882,110 | (3) | | 10.9 | % |
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210 | | 10,536,593 | (4) | | 10.6 | % |
|
| | | | | | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership | | | Percent
of Class (1) |
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210 | | 14,741,834 | (2) | | 15.0 | % |
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355 | | 8,701,142 | (3) | | 8.8 | % |
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055 | | 8,401,374 | (4) | | 8.5 | % |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746 | | 5,941,287 | (5) | | 6.0 | % |
| |
(1) | All percentages are based on the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 21, 2018. |
| |
(2) | The amount beneficially owned of 14,741,834 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is as reported by FMR LLC in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2018. The Schedule 13G/A reports that FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 991,486 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 14,741,834 shares. The Schedule 13G/A identifies FMR LLC as a parent holding company and identifies the relevant subsidiaries of FMR LLC collectively and beneficially owning the shares being reported in the Schedule 13G/A as: FIAM LLC; Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company; FMR Co., Inc.; and Strategic Advisers, Inc. The Schedule 13G/A further reports: (i) FMR Co., Inc. is the beneficial owner of 5% or greater of the Common Stock outstanding; (ii) Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC; (iii) members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of the voting equity of FMR LLC; (iv) the Johnson family group and other equity owners of FMR LLC have entered into a voting agreement; (v) through their ownership of voting equity and the execution of the voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC; (vi)(2)The amount beneficially owned of 16,991,903 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is as reported by BlackRock, Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 25, 2021. The Schedule 13G reports that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 16,613,875 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 16,991,903 shares. The Schedule 13G further reports that: (a) BlackRock Fund Advisors, a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 5% or greater of the Common Stock outstanding; and (b) iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF has the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the Common Stock of, 5% or more of the Common Stock outstanding. (3)The amount beneficially owned of 10,882,110 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is as reported by The Vanguard Group in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021. The Schedule 13G/A reports that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 10,702,205 shares, shared voting power with respect to 98,147 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 179,905 shares. The Schedule 13G/A further reports that certain subsidiaries of The Vanguard Group own shares of Common Stock but does not identify any such subsidiary as beneficially owning 5% or greater of the Common Stock outstanding. (4)The amount beneficially owned of 10,536,593 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is as reported by FMR LLC in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2021. The Schedule 13G/A reports that FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 1,096,184 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 10,536,593 shares. The Schedule 13G/A identifies FMR LLC as a parent holding company and identifies the relevant subsidiaries of FMR LLC collectively and beneficially owning the shares being reported in the Schedule 13G/A as: FIAM LLC and Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (“FMR Co. LLC”). The Schedule 13G/A further reports: (a) FMR Co. LLC is the beneficial owner of 5% or greater of the Common Stock outstanding; (b) Abigail P. Johnson is a director, the chairman and the chief executive officer of FMR LLC; (c) members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of the voting equity of FMR LLC; (d) the Johnson family group and other equity owners of FMR LLC have entered into a voting agreement; (e) through their ownership of voting equity and the execution of the voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC; (f) neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ boards of trustees; and (vii) Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ boards of trustees. The Schedule 13G/A disclaims reporting on shares, if any, beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries, affiliates or other companies whose beneficial ownership of shares is disaggregated from that of FMR LLC in accordance with SEC Release No. 34-39538 (January 12, 1998). |
| |
(3) | The amount beneficially owned of 8,701,142 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is as reported by The Vanguard Group in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018. The Schedule 13G/A reports that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 51,913 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 8,645,103 shares, shared voting power with respect to 11,371 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 56,039 shares. The Schedule 13G/A further reports that: (i) Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 44,668 shares, or 0.05% of the Common Stock outstanding, as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts; and (ii) Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 18,616 shares, or 0.02% of the Common Stock outstanding, as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. |
| |
(4) | The amount beneficially owned of 8,401,374 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is as reported by BlackRock, Inc. in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 29, 2018. The Schedule 13G/A reports that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 7,990,019 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 8,401,374 shares. |
| |
(5) | The amount beneficially owned of 5,941,287 shares of Common Stock, as shown, is reported by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018. The Schedule 13G reports that Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power with respect to 5,766,285 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to |
5,941,287 shares. The Schedule 13G further reports that: (i) Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (the “Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of 1940,FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ boards of trustees; and serves as investment manager or sub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as(g) FMR Co. LLC carries out the “Funds”); (ii) in certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP may act as an adviser or sub-adviser to certain Funds; (iii) in its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Dimensional”) may possess voting and/or investment power over the shares that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares, however, all of the shares reported inunder written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ boards of trustees. The Schedule 13G are13G/A disclaims reporting on shares, if any, beneficially owned by the Funds; and (iv) Dimensional disclaimscertain subsidiaries, affiliates or other companies whose beneficial ownership of such shares.shares is disaggregated from that of the FMR reporting entities in accordance with SEC Release No. 34-39538 (January 12, 1998).
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
During 2017,2020, our Board of Directors held eightfive meetings of the full Board and 1714 meetings of committees of the Board. Each of our continuing directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and meetings of committees of the Board on which he or she served (during the period of his service). In addition, we have a policy that directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting. Last year, all of our directors except Messrs. Berry and Reinhardsen attended our Annual Meeting. In 2017,2020, the nonemployee directors met in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present, and similar sessions are scheduled for 2018.2021. The chairmen of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chair these executive sessions on a rotating basis.basis under our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Interested parties may communicate directly with the nonemployee directors by sending a letter to the “Board of Directors (Independent Members),” c/o Corporate Secretary, Oceaneering International, Inc., 11911 FM 529, Houston, Texas 77041-3000.
Under rules adopted by the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), our Board of Directors must have a majority of independent directors. The director independence standards of the NYSE require a board determination that our director has no material relationship with us and has no specific relationships that preclude independence. Our Board considers relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether a director is independent. Our Board has determined that, with the exception of Mr.Messrs. Larson and McEvoy, all of our directors currently meet the NYSE independence requirements.
We have three standing committees of our Board, of Directors: the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. composed as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director | | Audit
Committee | | Compensation
Committee | | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
| Karen H. Beachy | | | | Member | | |
| William B. Berry | | | | Member | | |
| Deanna L. Goodwin | | Member | | Chair | | |
| Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | Chair | | | | Member |
| Jon Erik Reinhardsen | | Member | | Member | | Member |
| Kavitha Velusamy | | Member | | | | |
| Steven A. Webster | | | | | | Chair |
Our Board has determined that each member of these committees is independent in accordance with the requirements of the NYSE. Our Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements that the SEC has established for service on an audit committee.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which is comprised of Messrs.directors Murphy (Chairman)(Chair), Berry andGoodwin, Reinhardsen held eight meetings during 2017. Effective February 2018, Ms. Goodwin replaced(who succeeded Mr. ReinhardsenCollins as a member of the Audit Committee.committee in May 2020) and Velusamy (since her appointment in January 2021), held six meetings during 2020.
Our Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Goodwin and Messrs. Murphy and Reinhardsen are audit committee financial experts and that all current members of the Audit Committee are audit committee financial expertsfinancially literate, as defined in the applicable rules of the SEC.SEC and the NYSE. For information relating to the background of each member of the Audit Committee, see the biographical information under “Information about Nominees for Election and Continuing Directors.”
The Audit Committee is appointed by our Board, of Directors, on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, to assist the Board in its oversight of:
•the integrity of our financial statements;
•our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements;
•the independence, qualifications and performance of our independent auditors;
•the performance of our internal audit functions; and
•the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for our internal controls and preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Our independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and issuing reports thereon. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the conduct of these activities and appointing our independent auditors. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors.Board. As stated above and in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight. The Audit Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to Oceaneering’s financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent auditors’ work.
The Audit Committee annually reviews the performance and independence of the independent auditors in deciding whether to retain independent auditors or engage a different independent registered public accounting firm for the ensuing year. In the course of these reviews, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the independent auditors’: general qualifications; historical quality of service provided to us; sufficiency of resources; quality of communication and interaction; and independence, objectivity and professional skepticism. The Audit Committee also considers whether, in order to assure continuing auditor independence, there should be regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm acting as our independent auditor, which includes consideration of the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.
In discharging its duties, the Audit Committee also reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit, non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors and the independent auditors’ audit and non-audit fees; reviews and discusses with management (including the senior internal auditor) and the independent auditors’ annual audit of our internal control over financial reporting; recommends to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC; meets independently with our senior compliance and internal auditors,audit personnel, independent auditors and management; reviews, among other things, the general scope of our accounting, financial reporting, annual audit and our internal audit programs and matters relating to internal control systems, information technology and cybersecurity, legal and regulatory matters and taxes, as well as the results of the annual audit and interim financial statements, auditor independence issues and the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter; and reviews with management and the independent auditors any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and any published reports that raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies.
A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available under the Governance tab in the Governance section under Investor Relations onsection of our Web sitewebsite (www.oceaneering.com). Any shareholder may obtain a written copy of the charter from us upon request. The report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Report of the Audit Committee.”
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, comprised of Messrs.directors Goodwin (Chair), Beachy (since her appointment in January 2021), Berry (Chairman),and Reinhardsen, and Webster, held four meetings during 2017.2020. Effective February 2018,in March 2020, Ms. Goodwin replaced Mr. WebsterBerry as a memberChair of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee is appointed by our Board of Directors to:
•assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to: (i)(1) compensation of our executive officers and nonemployee directors; and (ii)(2) employee benefit plans and practices; and
•produce or assist management with the preparation of any reports that may be required from time to time by the rules of the NYSE or the SEC to be included in our proxy statements for our annual meetings of shareholders or annual reports on Form 10-K.
Specific duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include: overseeing our executive and key employee compensation plans and benefit programs; reviewing and approving objectives relevant to the
compensation of executives and key employees, including administration of annual bonus plans, long-term incentive plans, supplemental executive retirement plan and severance, termination and change-of-control arrangements; approving employment agreements for key executives; reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the directors’ and officers’ indemnification and insurance matters; evaluating the performance of executives and key employees, including our Chief Executive Officer; recommending to the Board the compensation for the Board and committees of the Board; and annually evaluating its own performance and its charter.
On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee engages a recognized human resourceexecutive compensation consulting firm (the “Compensation Consultant”) to assist the Compensation Committee in its administration of compensation for our directors and executive officers. The Compensation Consultant provides to the Compensation Committee a market analysis including: (i)including total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive compensation), retirement benefits and perquisites for each of our executive officers and certain other key employees; and (ii) compensation for nonemployee directors among peer group companies and other survey data (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – The Role of the Compensation Consultant” in this Proxy Statement). The Compensation Consultant engaged in 2017, as in 2016 and 2015,2020 was Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, (“Meridian”).which has served in this capacity since 2015.
The Compensation Committee approves the forms and amounts of annual and long-term incentive program compensation for our executive officers and other key employees, and recommends to the Board the forms and amounts of compensation for nonemployee directors.
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors.Board. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available under the Governance tab in the Governance section under Investor Relations onsection of our Web sitewebsite (www.oceaneering.com). Any shareholder may obtain a written copy of the charter from us upon request. The report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Report of the Compensation Committee.”
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, comprised of Messrs.directors Webster (Chairman)(Chair), Murphy and Reinhardsen, held fivefour meetings during 2017.2020.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is appointed by our Board of Directors to, among other things:
•identify individuals qualified to become directors of Oceaneering;
•recommend to our Board candidates to fill vacancies on our Board or to stand for election to the Board by our shareholders;
•recommend to our Board a director to serve as Chairman of the Board;
•recommend to our Board committee assignments for directors;
•periodically assess the performance of our Board and its committees;
•periodically review with our Board succession planning with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;
•monitor and advise the Board regarding environmental, corporate social responsibility, sustainability and governance (collectively, “ESG”) matters and have oversight responsibility for Oceaneering’s public reporting on ESG matters;
•monitor emerging issues potentially affecting the reputation of Oceaneering and the industries in which Oceaneering has significant operations;
•monitor and advise the Board regarding public policy issues, including Oceaneering’s political contributions policies and practices and lobbying priorities and activities;
•evaluate related-person transactions in accordance with our policy regarding such transactions; and
•periodically review and assess the adequacy of our corporate governance policies and procedures.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors.Board. A copy of this charter and a copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available under the Governance tab in the Governance section under Investor Relations onsection of our Web sitewebsite (www.oceaneering.com). Any shareholder may obtain a written copy of each of these documents from us upon request.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits ideas for potential Board candidates from a number of sources, including members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers. The Committee also has authority to select and compensate a third-party search firm to help identify candidates, if it deems it advisable to do so.
Shareholder Nominations for Board Candidates
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider nominees recommended by shareholders in accordance with our Bylaws. In assessing the qualifications of all prospective nominees to the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, in addition to criteria set forth in our Bylaws, each nominee’s personal and professional integrity, experience, skills, ability and willingness to devote the time and effort necessary to be an effective board member, and commitment to acting in the best interests of Oceaneering and its shareholders. Consideration also will be given to the Board’s diversity and having an appropriate mix of backgrounds and skills. In that regard, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any search for potential director candidates should consider diversity as to gender, ethnic background and personal and professional experiences and that any initial list of new director candidates developed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or by a third-party consultant engaged by or on behalf of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, to fill any vacancy in Board membership should include one or more qualified women and minority candidates.
A shareholder who wishes to recommend a nominee for director should comply with the procedures specified in our Bylaws, as well as applicable securities laws and regulations of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all candidates identified through the processes described above, whether identified by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or by a shareholder, and will evaluate each of them on the same basis.
As to each person a shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, our Bylaws provide that the nomination notice must:
•include the name, age, business address, residence address (if known) and principal occupation or employment of that person, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned or owned of record by that person and any other information relating to that person that is required to be disclosed under Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the related SEC rules and regulations; and
•be accompanied by the written consent of the person to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
The nomination notice must also include, as to that shareholder and any of that shareholder’s “associates” (defined to include (i)(1) any person acting in concert with that shareholder, (ii)(2) any person who beneficially owns shares of Common Stock owned of record or beneficially by that shareholder and (iii)(3) any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with, directly or indirectly, that shareholder or any person described in the foregoing clause (i)(1) or (ii)(2)) on whose behalf the nomination or nominations are being made:
•the name and address of that shareholder, as they appear on our stock records and the name and address of that associate;
•the number of shares of Common Stock which that shareholder and that associate own beneficially or of record;
•a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding relating to any hedging or other transaction or series of transactions (including any derivative or short position, profit interest, option, hedging transaction or borrowing or lending of shares) that has been entered into or made by that shareholder or that associate, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss, manage risk or benefit from share price changes or to increase or decrease the voting power of that shareholder or that associate, in any case with respect to any share of Common Stock;
•a description of all arrangements and understandings between that shareholder or that associate and each proposed nominee of that shareholder and any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the nomination(s) are to be made by that shareholder;
•a representation by that shareholder that he or she intends to appear in person or by proxy at that meeting to nominate the person(s) named in that nomination notice;
•a representation as to whether that shareholder or that associate, if any, intends, or is part of a group, as Rule 13d-5(b) under the Exchange Act uses that term, which intends, (i)(1) to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to the holders of shares of Common Stock having at least the percentage of the total votes of the holders of all outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote in the election of each proposed nominee of that shareholder which is required to elect that proposed nominee and/or (ii)(2) otherwise to solicit proxies in support of the nomination; and
•any other information relating to that shareholder and that associate that is required to be disclosed under Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the related SEC rules and regulations, in connection with solicitations of proxies for an election of a director.
In addition, the nomination notice must include a representation that the shareholder will notify us in writing of any change in any of the information referenced above as of the record date for the meeting of shareholders to which the nomination relates promptly following the later of that record date or the date notice of that record date is first publicly disclosed. We may require any person a shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director under the provisions described above to furnish additional written information to determine the eligibility of that person to serve as a director.
To be timely for consideration at our 20192022 Annual Meeting, a shareholder’s nomination notice must be received at our principal executive offices, 11911 FM 529, Houston, Texas 77041-3000, addressed to our Corporate Secretary, not earlier than November 5, 20188, 2021 and not later than the close of business on January 4, 2019.February 6, 2022.
LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND BOARD RISK OVERSIGHT
We currently have a leadership structure that includes separate individuals serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board. Our Board believes this structure is appropriate in the existing circumstances, as Mr. Larson, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Huff, Chairman of our Board, currently serve our company in separate and distinct roles. Our Board believes it is appropriate to retain the flexibility to combine those two positions in the future, should future circumstances result in a situation in which our Board determines that such a combination is appropriate.
The members of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include only persons whom the Board has affirmatively determined are independent. None of the Chairmenchairs of our Board committees serves as chairmanchair of more than one of those committees. As discussed above, our Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and Ms. Goodwin and Messrs. Murphy and Reinhardsen are audit committee financial experts as defined in the applicable rules of the SEC.SEC and the NYSE. Although our Board believes the current membership and leadership structure for our Board committees are appropriate in the existing circumstances, our Board also believes it is appropriate to retain the flexibility to change Board committee memberships and leadership structure in the future, should future circumstances warrant such a change in the view of our Board.
The risk oversight role of our Board and its committees is set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and respective committee charters. Our Board and its committees are actively involved in the oversight of risks applicable to Oceaneering through oversight of our enterprise risk management program. Our Board oversees our:our risks associated with:
financial-•our operations, workforce, markets and compliance-related risksstrategy;
•compliance and financial matters, with the assistance of the Audit Committee;
risks associated with•ESG matters, climate change and sustainability, public policy, our Board and executive officer leadership and succession, conflicts of interest, and more generally with the adequacy of our
governance policies and procedures, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and
risks associated with •compensation policies and practices for executive officers and key employees, with the assistance of the Compensation Committee.
Our Compensation Committee considers, in establishing and reviewing compensation programs, whether the programs encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Based on analyses conducted by management and discussed with the Compensation Committee, we do not believe that our compensation programs for our executives and other employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. Our Board believes that the current structure of our Audit Committee, with all members being independent and financially literate and several members being audit committee financial experts, and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee, with all members being independent, provides for an efficient and effective means of overseeing these risks. Our Board also oversees our strategic and operations-related risks. Our Board believes that the relative levels of experience and independence of our Board members, collectively, support the Board’s ability to effectively oversee these risks.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No member of the Compensation Committee has served as one of our officers or employees at any time. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the compensation committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Compensation Committee. None of our directors or executive officers are members of the same family.
CODE OF ETHICS
Our Board of Directors adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers, including our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer or Controller, and a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all our directors, officers directors and employees. Each is available onunder the Governance pagetab in the Investor Relations section of our Web sitewebsite (www.oceaneering.com). Any shareholder may obtain a printed copy of these codes from us upon request. Any change in or waiver of these codes of ethics will be disclosed on our Web site.website.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock to file with the SEC and the NYSE initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to usfiled electronically with the SEC and representations that no other reports were required, we believe that all our directors and executive officers complied on a timely basis with all applicable filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during 2020.
2017, except that Mr. Eric A. Silva, our Senior Vice President, Operations Support filed a Form 4 that reported, after the time prescribed, a purchase of Common Stock by him and Mr. Robert P. Moschetta, our Senior Vice President, Health Safety Environment/Training/Quality, filed a Form 4 that reported, after the time prescribed, a sale of Common Stock by him.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Audit Committee of Oceaneering International, Inc.’sour Board of Directors was comprised of the directors named below. Each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director as defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit Committee met eightsix times during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP, Oceaneering’s independent registered public accounting firm, all of Oceaneering’s earnings releases in 20172020 prior to the public release of those earnings releases. In addition, the Chairmanchair of the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the interim financial information included in Oceaneering’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2017, 2020, June 30, 20172020 and September 30, 2017,2020, prior to their being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young Oceaneering’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Members of management represented to
the Audit Committee that Oceaneering’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young matters required to be discussed under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed, with management and Ernst & Young, our management’s report and Ernst & Young’s report on internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Ernst & Young provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young’s independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young their independence from Oceaneering. The Audit Committee concluded that Ernst & Young’s provision of non-audit services to Oceaneering and its affiliates is compatible with Ernst & Young’s independence.
Based on the Audit Committee’s discussions with management and Ernst & Young and the Audit Committee’s review of the items referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to Oceaneering’s Board of Directors that Oceaneering’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20172020 be included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172020 filed with the SEC.
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Audit Committee |
| | Paul B. Murphy, Jr., Chairman William B. Berry
Chair
Deanna L. Goodwin
Jon Erik Reinhardsen |
PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE
THE COMPENSATION OF OCEANEERING’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As required by Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, we are providing our shareholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (including, for purposes of this proposal, our Former Chief Executive Officer) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
In making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors considers all elements of compensation when setting each element of compensation. The Compensation Committee assesses each element of base salary, annual incentive bonus, long-term incentive compensation and retirement plan value against a combination of available information from the most recent proxy statements of a peer group of publicly traded companies and survey data from the energy and general industries.
As described in detail under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement below, our compensation program for Named Executive Officers is designed to attract, retain and motivate key executives and to deliver a competitive package that is aligned with our shareholders’ interests, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk taking.
A significant portion of ourthat compensation program is delivered through variable compensation elements that are tied to key performance objectives. Generally, at least one-half of the 2017 target total direct compensation (annual salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives) of our Named Executive Officers is performance-based and approximately 60% of the estimated grant date value of their long-term incentive awards is performance-based.
Achievement of specificThe coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted energy demand, negatively affecting operator investments in oil and gas projects, forced widespread changes in work and leisure activities, limiting theme park attendance, and been accompanied by intensified interest in energy transition. These factors, combined with the prolonged downturn in the offshore oilfield markets we serve, have impacted our business and financial goals below threshold forresults and negatively affected the period of 2015-2017 resulted in there being noannual and long-term incentive performance unit cash payouts for any participating employees. Compared to 2016,compensation of our operating income for 2017 declined 85%.Named Executive Officers. Accordingly, we have continued athe series of initiatives we startedbegan in 2015 to align our operations with current and anticipated activity and pricing levels, whichas well as making operational adjustments to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. These initiatives have necessarily included workforce reductions incurring unusualand expenses, as well as the recognition of some significant impairment charges and making certain accounting adjustments. Despite these challenges, notable achievementsother asset write-downs. In consideration of those measures, the Committee approved a change in 2017 included:one of the metrics of our 2018 performance unit program from Cumulative EBITDA to Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA, which aligns it with the earnings metric approved by the Committee for our subsequent performance unit programs (see the discussion in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive
Compensation Components” below, including under the headings “Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash” and “Long-Term Incentive Compensation — 2018-2020 Performance Units”).
As we have continued to review our cost structure and implement operational and cost-improvement initiatives, the achievement of goals and amounts realized by our Named Executive Officers for 2020 under our performance-based incentive programs have been positively affected, as follows:
•our 2020 annual bonus program attainment was near target; and
•our long-term performance unit program attainment in 2020 exceeded target (after giving effect to the change in a program metric referenced above).
In 2020, our consolidated revenue decreased by approximately 11% from $2 billion in 2019 to $1.8 billion, reflecting decreases in all business segments except our Aerospace and Defense Technologies segment, which was the only one of our operating segments was profitable, that contributed positive operating income. Despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and the prolonged downturn in the oilfield markets we serve, our 2020 operating performance benefited considerably from the cost and operational improvements instituted during the year and notable achievements included:
•achieving a Total Recordable Incident Rate (“TRIR”) of 0.3, the lowest rate of recordable employee injury incidents in our company’s history, with no recordable COVID-19 incidents;
•establishing and adhering to COVID-19 safety protocols that allowed us to minimize employees’ workplace exposure while also maintaining business continuity;
•improving our gross margin of $98 million in 2019 by 67% to $164 million in in 2020;
•realigning our business segments and changing our organizational structure to achieve greater cost efficiencies, with year-over-year improvements in gross margin in four of our five business segments, despite decreased revenue in four of our five business segments in 2020 as compared to 2019;
•continuing to: (1) deliver innovative robotics and automation solutions, including our resident, battery-powered remotely operated vehicle (“ROV”) system to support subsea inspection, maintenance and repair (“IMR”) activities and our high-current work-class ROV to serve the offshore renewable energy market; and (2) develop our next-generation hybrid ROV and autonomous underwater vehicle, to provide IMR services to the subsea pipeline and infrastructure market; while maintaining our ROV fleet size and utilization at levels consistent with those in 2019;
•achieving significant improvement in our Integrity Management and Digital Solutions segment, with gross margins increasing by $14 million, or 94%, over 2019, despite a 15% decrease in revenue; and achieving over $250 million in new contract awards during the fourth quarter of 2020 and early 2021 to position the segment for growth;
•increasing gross margin and gross margin percentage 29% and 30%, respectively, in our Manufactured Products segment, due to better execution and improved operating efficiencies (although overall segment results declined from 2019, primarily due to goodwill and long-lived asset impairments taken during the year), and implementing measures to mitigate the loss of demand, which resulted in a decrease in backlog to $266 million as of December 31, 2020, from $548 million as of December 31, 2019;
•increasing revenue and operating income of $11 million;
declaring cash dividends aggregating to $44 million, or $0.45 per share;
continuing substantial investmentsby 7% and 32%, respectively, in opportunities to expand our business, with 2017 capital expenditures of approximately $105 million (including $11 million on acquisitions/investments);
endingAerospace and Defense Technologies segment and achieving several important incremental contract wins during the year, including with a subsea products backlog of $276 million;respect to the Human Lunar Landing System for NASA and maintaining the U.S. Navy’s submarine rescue systems;
maintaining an appropriately capitalized balance sheet with $752 million of working capital, including $430 million of•increasing cash and cash equivalents $800on our balance sheet by $78 million, or 21%, to $452 million as of debt and $1.7 billion of equity at December 31, 2017.2020, and maintaining strong liquidity without drawing on our revolving credit facility; and
•enhancing our ESG disclosures on our website, including the publication of our initial report using the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board standards, under the oversight of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which has assumed responsibility for overseeing public reporting and advising the Board on ESG matters.
The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the rules of the SEC. As an advisory vote, it is not binding. However, our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and overseeing the administration of our executive compensation program, will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers.
Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that Oceaneering’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in Oceaneering’s Proxy Statement for its 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 20172020 Summary Compensation Table and the other compensation-related tables and accompanying narrative disclosures.
In accordance with our Bylaws, the adoption of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Because abstentions are counted as present for purposes of the vote on this proposal, but are not votes “FOR” this proposal, they have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on this vote.
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote such proxy FOR approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers unless a choice is set forth therein or unless an abstention or broker “non-vote” is indicated therein.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following discussion and analysis contains statements regarding future individual and company performance goals and measures. These goals and measures are disclosed in the limited context of Oceaneering’s compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. Oceaneering cautions investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or “CD&A,” provides information regarding the compensation programs in place for our current Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and three other most highly compensated executive officers during 2017.2020. We refer to these individuals in this Proxy Statement as the “Named Executive Officers.” In addition, this CD&A provides some compensation-related information for our former Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kevin McEvoy, who retired in May 2017 (our “Former Chief Executive Officer”). This CD&A also includes information regarding, among other things, the objectives of our compensation program, the achievements that the compensation program is designed to reward, the elements of the compensation program (including the reasons why we employ each element and how we determine amounts paid) and how each element fits into our overall compensation objectives. As used in this CD&A, references to the “Committee” mean the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.Board.
Executive Summary
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate key executives and to deliver a competitive package to our executive officers that is aligned with our shareholders’ interests. When considering our program, we believe it is important to note:
•the primary components of our compensation program consist of annual base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives and retirement plans that are designed in the aggregate to provide opportunity that is competitive with the 50th percentile of a peer group and survey data identified by the Compensation Consultant retained by the Committee;
•a significant portion of the program is delivered through variable compensation elements that are tied to key performance objectives of Oceaneering. Generally, at least one-half of the target total direct compensation (annual salary and annual and long-term incentives at target levels) is performance-basedperformance-
based and approximately 60% of the estimated grant date value of long-term incentive awards is performance-based;
the worldwide slump in oil prices from 2014 levels and resulting slowdown in deepwater activity•throughout 2020, we continued to impactreview our cost structure and implement operational and cost-improvement initiatives to respond to the prolonged downturn in the offshore oilfield markets we serve, while maintaining our focus on operational safety, including the following;
–among our safety-related achievements, establishing and adhering to COVID-19 safety protocols allowing us to minimize employees’ workplace exposure, while maintaining business continuity, and recorded a TRIR of 0.3, the lowest rate of recordable employee injury incidents in our company’s history, with no recordable COVID-19 incidents;
–realigning our business segments and financial resultschanging our organizational structure to achieve greater cost efficiencies, achieving a 67% improvement in our gross margin compared to 2019, with year-over-year improvements in gross margin in four of our five business segments;
–increasing cash and accordingly, negatively affectedcash equivalents on our balance sheet by $78 million, or 21%, to $452 million as of December 31, 2020, without drawing on our revolving credit facility; and
–enhancing our ESG disclosures, including publication of our first report under the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board standards;
•at management’s request, due to the uncertain effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee approved voluntary executive salary reductions equal to 10% of the amount of base salary that would have been paid to each of the Named Executive Officers from May 1 through December 31, 2020, except that, in the case of Mr. Larson, our President and Chief Executive Officer, the reduction percentage was 15%, and the Board approved a reduction of 50% in employee-matching contributions in our 401(k) plan);
•the Committee continued to monitor the effects of the pandemic, but elected not to alter or supplement the annual andor long-term incentive programs approved in February 2020 for the Named Executive Officers; and
•our financial performance continued to improve in 2020, as demonstrated by increases in our Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow; as a consequence of the positive results of our operational and cost-improvement initiatives, the amounts realized by our Named Executive Officers were earned at 87% of target under our 2020 annual incentive program and at 123% of target for our 2018-2020 performance units.
In 2019 and 2020, to assist the Committee in setting compensation of the Named Executive Officers;Officers for 2020, the Compensation Consultant assessed the competitiveness of Oceaneering’s executive compensation program relative to industry benchmarks, and the alignment of that program with Oceaneering’s compensation philosophy and objectives, and advised that:
annual incentive payouts•certain changes to the peer group were recommended for use by the Committee in setting the compensation of the Named Executive Officers for 2017 were approximately 26% of target amounts, reflecting achievement of positive cash flow between threshold and target levels and attainment of health, safety, environmental protection and quality goals at target; and
there were no payouts to the Named Executive Officers under our 2015 long-term incentive performance unit program, as the threshold level of performance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 was not attained for either average return on invested capital or cumulative cash flow.
Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, the compensation consultant retained by the Committee (the “Compensation Consultant”), performed, among other things, an assessment of:
the continued validity(see “— The Role of the peer group of companies used for comparison purposes in the preceding year;Compensation Consultant” below);
the competitiveness of cash compensation, equity awards, retirement benefits and perquisites provided to our executive officers and other key employees relative to our peer group and energy industry survey data;
Oceaneering’s performance relative to our peer group in terms of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash bonus payout; and
Oceaneering’s incentive structure for executive officers.
The Compensation Consultant assessed that:
the peer group selected by the Committee was appropriate;
•the target total direct compensation of most Oceaneering executives was at or belowapproximated the relevant 50th percentilemedian of the peer group;Compensation Peer Group;
•amounts realized from our executive compensation and Oceaneering’s performanceprogram were generally aligned in favor of our shareholders’ interests; and
Oceaneering’s incentive structure for its executive officers was generally aligned with Oceaneering’s compensation philosophyperformance; and objectives and market practices, although Oceaneering’s
•our incentive structure for our executive compensation hasofficers reflected a greater weight placed more emphasis than its peersby the Committee on annualperformance-based long-term incentives, meeting absolute performance goals, limiting upside leverage, and denominating long-term performance awards in cash.relative to most of our peers.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain key executives, motivate them to achieve our short-term and long-term objectives without exposing us to excessive or unnecessary risk, and reward them for superior performance. We use several different compensation elements in the executive compensation program that are geared to both our short-term and long-term performance. The following principles influence the design and administration of our executive compensation program.
Compensation Should Be Related to Performance
The Committee and our Board of Directors believe that a significant portion of an executive officer’s direct compensation should be tied to overall company performance and measured against financial goals and other performance-based objectives.
Under the performance-based portions of our compensation arrangements, our basic philosophy is that, in years when performance is better than the objectives established for the relevant performance period, Named Executive Officers should be paid more than the target awards and, when our performance does not meet planned objectives, incentive award payments should be less than such targets, in the absence of special circumstances.
Compensation Programs Should Motivate Executives to Remain Withwith Us
We believe that there is significant value to our shareholders for our executive officers to remain with our company over time. Our business success and growth depend on leadership by executives with a keen understanding of our services and products and the markets we serve and who can develop and maintain strong customer relationships over time. Also, value is built by executives who understand the unique business and technical aspects of our industry. For these reasons, a significant part of our executive compensation arrangements historically has been a combination of long-term incentive compensation arrangements, with awards that have provided for vesting over several years. In addition, to promote long-term retention, we provide our executive officers with incentives to remain focused on their duties in the event of any change of control, including some financial security in the event of a change of control. We also provide for long-term benefits through retirement plans (see “— Executive Compensation Components — Post-Employment Compensation Programs”Programs” below).
Incentive Compensation Should Represent a Significant Part of an Executive’s Total Direct Compensation
We believe that the portion of an executive officer’s total compensation that varies with our overall performance objectives should increase as the scope and level of the individual’s business responsibilities and role in the organization increase. We believe that, generally, at least one-half of the target total direct compensation (the sum of annual base salary and annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive compensation at target levels) of our executive officers should be at risk against short- and long-term performance goals, and our Chief Executive Officer should be subject to a greater amount of such risk than other executive officers.
Incentive Compensation Should Balance Short-Term and Long-Term Performance
We strive to maintain an executive compensation program that balances short-term, or annual, results and long-term results. To reinforce the importance of this balance, we regularly provide our executive officers both annual and long-term incentives. We believe we should avoid disproportionately large short-term or annual incentives that could encourage our executive officers to take excessive and unnecessary risks. The value for participants in our long-term incentive programs generally increases at higher levels of responsibility, as executives in these leadership roles have the greatest influence on our strategic direction and results over time.
The Committee’s approach to long-term incentives is to make both service- and performance-based awards to our executive officers and other key employees. The service-based awards have consisted of restricted stock units, and the performance-based awards have consisted of performance units. The long-term incentive awards are scheduled to vest in full on the third anniversary of the award date, subject to earlier vesting as described below under “— Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation.Compensation.” The Committee believes that performance-based awards, valued at target level, should account for approximately 60% of the total annual long-term incentive compensation of the Named Executive Officers and service-based awards should account for the balance. For this purpose, the Committee assumes a value for restricted stock units based on the grant date value computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 – Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”) and performance units based on the value at target of $100
$100 per unit. The Committee believes that this approach promotes our philosophy of rewarding executives for growing shareholder value over time. Upon vesting, settlement of the restricted stock units will be made in shares of our Common Stock, with some shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding requirements. Upon vesting, the value of the performance units will be paid in cash.
Compensation Levels Should Be Competitive
The Committee reviews competitive compensation information as part of its process in establishing target total direct compensation and retirement plan values that are competitive. In making compensation decisions, the Committee considers all elements of compensation when setting each element of compensation. The Committee assesses each element of base salary, annual incentive bonus, long-term incentive compensation and retirement plan values against a combination of available information from the most recent proxy statements and other public disclosures of a peer group of publicly traded companies and industry survey data.
The Role of the Compensation Committee
The Committee has the primary authority to establish compensation for the Named Executive Officers and other key employees and administers all our executive compensation programs and agreements. The Committee annually reviews corporate goals and objectives, and sets the compensation levels for our executive officers based on the Committee’s evaluation. Our Chief Executive Officer assists the Committee by providing annual recommendations regarding the compensation of our executive officers and other key employees, excluding himself. The Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying or accepting these recommendations. The Chief Executive Officer attends Committee meetings. However, the Committee also meets in executive session without the Chief Executive Officer or other members of management present.
The Committee reviews comparative compensation information compiled by a compensation consultant as described in “— The Role of the Compensation Consultant”Consultant” below; however, the Committee does not base its decisions on targeting compensation to specific benchmarks. Comparative compensation is one factor used by the Committee in making its compensation decisions. Overall, however, our compensation program for the Named Executive Officers is intended to create a total compensation opportunity that, on average, is competitive with the 50th percentile in the aggregate of appropriate competitive comparative compensation for a Named Executive Officer, as discussed in “— The Role of the Compensation Consultant”Consultant” below. For additional information regarding the role and responsibility of the Committee, please see “Committees of the Board — Compensation Committee”Committee” above.
Impact of 20172020 Say-on-Pay Vote on Executive Compensation
In approving the 20182021 compensation of the Named Executive Officers, the Committee reviewed the vote on the say-on-pay proposal at the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Approximately 92%93% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. The Committee believes this affirms shareholders’ support of Oceaneering’s approach to executive compensation. Accordingly, the Committee did not adopt any specific changes based on the vote.
The Committee will continue to consider the outcome of Oceaneering’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for named executive officers. The Committee expects to continue to hold say-on-pay votes every year, which is consistent with the votes cast by shareholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting regarding the frequency of such votes.
The Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Committee has the authority to engage a compensation consultant, legal counsel and other advisors, in its discretion, to assist the Committee in the discharge of its duties and responsibilities. In 2017,2019 and 2020, the Committee continued to retain Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as the Compensation Consultant to: (i)
•review the peer group of companies used for comparison purposes in the preceding year and assess the peer group’s continued validity; (ii)
•conduct a review of the competitiveness of our total direct compensation, retirement benefits and perquisites of the Named Executive Officers and other key employees, relative to data disclosed in proxy statements and other filings with the SEC by the peer group of companies and survey data; (iii)
•conduct a pay-for-performance analysis to assess the alignment of Chief Executive Officer payamounts realized from our executive compensation program and company performance for Oceaneering and the peer group of companies identified; (iv)
•assess Oceaneering’s incentive structure for executive officers; (v) officers and the alignment of that structure with Oceaneering’s compensation philosophy and objectives;
•assess Oceaneering’s compensation for nonemployee directors relative to market practices, including the compensation programs of a peer group of companies; (vi) assist in assessment of potential excise taxes pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code, assuming a change of control occurred on December 31, 2017; and (vii)
•assist the Committee in its duties with respect to the compensation of our executives, other key employees and nonemployee directors for 2018. directors.
The Committee has engaged Meridian in August 2016since 2015 to provide similar assistance to the Committee with respect to the compensation of our executive officers our other key employees and nonemployee directors for 2017.directors. The decision to engage the Compensation Consultant and approval of its compensation and other terms of engagement were made by the Committee without reliance on any recommendation of management. The Compensation Consultant’s only work for Oceaneering in 2017,2019 and 2020, as in 2016,prior years, was at the direction of the Committee. The Committee considered this and other factors in its recent assessment of the independence of the Compensation Consultant and concluded that the Compensation Consultant’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.
In February 2017, the
Compensation Peer Group
The Compensation Consultant assessed the continuing validity of the peer group of companies used for comparison purposes in the review conducted for the Committee in 2016determining the 2020 compensation of the Named Executive Officers and recommended a list of 16 publicly traded companies aschanges to the peer group used for comparison purposes in its 2017the prior year’s review (collectively, the(the “Compensation Peer Group”). The Compensation Peer Group was comprised of 14 of the 17 companies utilized as the peer group in 2016, reflectingfollows: the removal of Exterran Corporation, FMC Technologies,Bristow Group Inc. (now TechnipFMC(which had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection), Rowan Companies plc (which had been acquired by Valaris plc) and Tidewater, Inc., due to comparability issues, and the addition of Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and Frank’sWeatherford International N.V. In August 2017, the Compensation Peer Group was reduced to 15 companies with the removal of Atwood Oceanics, Inc., due to its announced acquisition by Ensco plc which was completed in October 2017.(which had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection).
The companies included in the Compensation Peer Group were approved for inclusion by the Committee primarily due to their operational focus broadly within the oilfield services industry and the belief that we compete with these companies for talent and for shareholder investment. The companies (besides Oceaneering) comprising the Compensation Peer Group, for purposes of determining the 2020 compensation of the Named Executive Officers, were:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BristowDiamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. | | Frank’s International N.V. | | Oil States International, Inc. |
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. | | Rowan Companies plc |
| Dril-Quip, Inc. | | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | | Superior Energy Services, Inc. |
EnscoForum Energy Technologies, Inc. | | Noble Corporation plc | | Transocean Ltd. |
| Frank’s International N.V. | | McDermott International, Inc. | | Transocean Ltd. |
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. | | Noble Corporation plc | | Weatherford InternationalValaris plc |
The survey data used by the Compensation Consultant for the Committee’s consideration in approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers in 2020 were obtained from the 2017 Total CompensationEquilar Top 25 Survey for the Energy Sector conducted by Mercer, which reports pay for all segments of the energy business for a variety of executive-level positions in which 200 organizations participated on average over the past three years (the “Compensation Survey Data”), representing a broad samplecustom group of the energy industry. energy-related companies of comparable size in terms of revenue.
The Compensation Consultant identified the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles for each of our executive officers based on position and pay rank, considering base salary and target values for annual bonus and long-term incentive compensation, at target values and, individually and in the aggregate, for the comparable position and pay of each of the Named Executive Officers and other key employeesaggregate. The Compensation Consultant identified these percentiles from (i)(1) information disclosed in relevant filings with the SEC by the companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group and (ii)(2) the Compensation Survey Data. The Compensation Consultant provided this and other information to the Committee at the Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings in 2017the fourth quarter of 2019 and 2018.first quarter of 2020 to assist with the establishment of 2020 compensation.
Compensation Benchmarking
The Compensation Consultant conducted a market analysis of Oceaneering’s executive compensation levels and the components of such compensation for 2016 relative to the Compensation Survey Data and Compensation Peer Group disclosure data (discussed in “— The Role of the Compensation Consultant”Consultant” above). The Committee considers the Compensation Consultant determined that,Consultant’s analysis as part of the Committee’s process in the aggregate, theseeking to establish and maintain target total direct compensation of most Oceaneering executives was at or below the relevant 50th percentile of the Compensation Peer Group. The target total direct compensation of the Named Executive Officers was at or below the 25th percentile of the peer group, reflecting executive transitions. that is competitive.
For the Named Executive Officers in the aggregate,
base salaries and long-term incentives at the Compensation Consultant found that the target levels were belowtotal direct compensation for 2020 approximated the 25th percentilemedian of the Compensation Peer Group, while annual cash incentives at target levelsas it has in prior years. For 2020, as in prior years, retirement plan values were above, the median. Retirement plan values and perquisites did notwere near, the median of the peer group, but neither significantly affectaffected the market position of the Named Executive Officers’ target total annual compensation value.values.
Pay for Performance
A significant portion of the total direct compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (and our other Named Executive Officers) is delivered through variable compensation elements that are tied to financial performance goals and safety objectives, including through our annual cash bonus programs (see “— Executive Compensation Components” below). The financial performance measures employed since 2019 in our annual cash bonus programs have been Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow (as defined).
In 2020, we continued the series of initiatives we began in 2015 to align our operations with anticipated activity and pricing levels, as well as making operational adjustments to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This continued review of our cost structure and implementation of operational and cost-improvement initiatives, in alignment with our performance-based incentive programs, have positively affected the achievement of goals and amounts realized by our Named Executive Officers for 2020 under those programs. In particular, despite the continued decline in levels of oilfield activity in the markets we serve and reduced revenue in 2020, our Adjusted EBITDA performance, Free Cash Flow, and safety performance have improved each year since 2018. Additionally, although our TSR (as defined below under “— Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation — 2020-2022 Performance Units”) was negative over this three-year time period, it was above the median of our peers.These results generated a payout of 87% of target for our 2020 annual bonus plan, and a 123% of target overall payout on our 2018-2020 performance units. This was the first time in the last four cycles that our performance units have paid above 20% of target and only the second time since 2015 that our annual bonus has been earned above 50% of target.
The Compensation Consultant assessedalso conducted an assessment of the alignment of amounts realized from our executive paycompensation program to Oceaneering’s performance in 20162019 relative to the Compensation Peer Group in terms of our Former Chief Executive Officer’s actual annual bonus with our net incomepayments to chief executive officers in 2020 for 2019 performance.The Compensation Consultant measured the alignment of pay and performance for 2019, against (1) growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), (2) return on average capital and (3) total shareholder return, compared tofor each member of the Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Consultant found that Oceaneering’s relative bonus payout was generally aligned with Oceaneering’s performance under these measures. Based on that assessment, the Compensation ConsultantCommittee concluded that our ChiefNamed Executive Officer’sOfficers’ compensation and Oceaneering’s performance were aligned in favor of shareholder interests, noting that Oceaneering was oneinterests.
The target total shareholder return was in the bottom halfdirect compensation of the Compensation Peer Group, although Oceaneering’s return on average capitalNamed Executive Officers approved in February 2020 that was in the top halfat risk against short- and long-term performance goals was 59% for Mr. Larson, our Chief Executive Officer, and between 51% and 56% for each of the group.other Named Executive Officers (see “— Executive Compensation Components,” “— Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash,” and “— Long-Term Incentive Compensation” below).
2017
Executive Compensation Components
For 2017,2020, the primary components of our compensation program for Named Executive Officers were:
•annual base salary;
•annual incentive awards paid in cash;
•long-term incentive programsawards comprised of restricted stock units and performance units; and
•retirement plans.benefits (which comprised a relatively small percentage of compensation).
The Compensation Consultant found that for 2020 the mix of direct compensation components (base salary and annual and long-term incentive awards at target) for the Named Executive Officers was well aligned with the peer group average, with long-term incentives comprising the majority of the executives’ target total direct compensation. These components for our Chief Executive Officer and peer company chief executive officers are shown below.
| | | | | | | | |
| Oceaneering CEO | | Peer Company CEOs |
| | |
Annual Base Salary
The Committee considers base salary levels annually,on an annual basis, generally in late February or early March, as well as upon a promotion or significant change in job responsibility. Each year, our Chief Executive Officer recommends base salaries for the other executive officers based on historical levels of base salaries and general market movement, with adjustments he deems appropriate based on the overall performance of the executive officer, including a review of relevant individual and operational or functional group contributions and performance, over the past year. In reviewing the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations and in deciding base salaries for all executive officers, the Committee considers each officer’s level of responsibility, experience, tenure, performance and the comparative compensation information provided by the Compensation Consultant. The Committee’s evaluation of each executive officer also takes into account an evaluation of Oceaneering’s overall performance. In February 2017,2020, the Committee approved salary increases for Messrs. Curtis and Lawrence, effective as follows, consistent with increases in prior years:
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Approved Increase
in Base Salary |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 5% |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 0% |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 5% |
| David K. Lawrence | | 3% |
| Eric A. Silva | | 5% |
At management’s request, however, due to the uncertain effects of 15% andthe COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee approved voluntary executive salary reductions equal to 10%, respectively; of the amount of base salaries approved forsalary that would have been paid to each of the other Named Executive Officers and our Former Chief Executive Officer were unchanged from 2016 levels. In May 2017,1 through December 31, 2020, except that, in the Committee approved an increasecase of approximately 27% in Mr. Larson’s salary, which took into account his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer following Mr. McEvoy’s retirement as Chief Executive Officer.Larson, the reduction percentage was 15%.
Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash
In late February or early March of each year, the Committee approves a performance-based annual cash bonus award program (the “Annual Cash Bonus Program”) under our shareholder-approved incentive plan for executive officers and certain other employees currently our Second Amended and Restated 2010 Incentive Plan (our “Incentive Plan”). AtAround that time, the Committee also approves the final bonus amounts payable under the cash bonus award programAnnual Cash Bonus Program for the previousimmediately preceding year.
The cash bonus award opportunities under this program have generally been determined by comparing actual to threshold, target and maximum results with respect to one or more selected financial metrics for our executive officers or a combination of financial and non-financial metrics for other employees, including attainment of health, safety, environmental and quality (“HSEQ”) goals, as approved by the Committee. The financial metric(s) have included our consolidated net income for the year, relevant product- or service-line operating income for the year, or a combination of both. For each participant, the maximum bonus achievable was an approved percentage of the participant’s annual salary determined by the Committee.
In February 2017,2020, the Committee approved a cash bonus award programthe Annual Cash Bonus Program for 2017.2020. For theeach Named Executive Officers,Officer, 60% of the target bonus opportunities wereopportunity was determined by comparing actual results to the performance levels set by the Committee for our Adjusted EBITDA for calendar year 2020. We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as Oceaneering’s consolidated earningsnet income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the year, adjusted to remove the effects of long-lived asset impairments, inventory write-downs, restructuring and other expenses and the net impact of foreign currency gains and losses for such year (“2020 Adjusted EBITDA”). Another 30% of the target bonus opportunity was determined by comparing actual results to the performance levels set by the Committee for our Free Cash Flow for calendar year 20172020 (“2017 EBITDA”2020 Free Cash Flow”). We define “Free Cash Flow” as cash flow provided by operating activities less organic capital expenditures (i.e., subject to
reduction by up topurchases of property and equipment other than those in business acquisitions). The remaining 10% if certain HSEQ goals were not fully satisfied.of the target bonus opportunity was based on the attainment of specific safety goals. The cash payout opportunity under the program for each Named Executive Officer was a specified percentage of his 20172020 base salary, (proratedadjusted for any changes in salary during the year).attainment of program goals as described below.
As recommended by our Former Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Committee in February 2017,2020, the targetplan amount for our 20172020 Adjusted EBITDA was $310$204 million reflectingand for our 2020 Free Cash Flow was $75 million, which reflected our forecast assumptions thatof increased demand and relatively stable pricing for many of theour services and products we offered would decline from 2016 levels and the achievement of operational and cost improvements in 2020, as compared to 2019. The target bonus opportunity was payable upon achievement of our projection that all our oilfield business segments would have lower operating income in 2017 than 2016.plan amount. The executive officers in the programAnnual Cash Bonus Program for 20172020 and their respective target awards, each as a percentage of base salary, included: Mr. Larson – 125%; Mr. Hewlett – 100%; Mr. Curtis – 75% (increased from 70% for 2016, reflecting his increased responsibilities); Mr. Lawrence – 70%; and Mr. Barrett – 70%. Mr. McEvoy, due to his retirement as Chief Executive Officer in May 2017, did not participate in
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Target Bonus Award (as a Percentage of Base Salary) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 125% |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 100% |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 75% |
| David K. Lawrence | | 75% |
| Eric A. Silva | | 75% |
In 2020, the 2017 cash bonus award program. The bonusAnnual Cash Bonus Program participation levels for our continuing Named Executive Officers, in each case as a percentage of base salary, were generallyunchanged from 2019 (except for Mr. Silva, who was not a Named Executive Officer in that year) and consistent with 2016.the levels approved for our Named Executive Officers in previous years.
The table below notes the percentagepercentages of the Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow components of a Named Executive Officer’s target award payable under the programAnnual Cash Bonus Program for the percentagepercentages of target 20172020 Adjusted EBITDA and 2020 Free Cash Flow achieved, with interpolation between the performance levels shown. The Committee had the discretion to award an amount less than that calculated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Performance Level | | 2020 Adjusted EBITDA ($) | | 2020 Free Cash Flow ($) | | % of 2020 Adjusted EBITDA Target | | % of 2020 Free Cash Flow Target | | % of Target Payout |
| Gate | | $134,300,000 | | | | 66% | | —% | | —% |
| Threshold | | $142,500,000 | | $20,000,000 | | 70% | | 27% | | 25% |
| Target (Plan) | | $203,500,000 | | $75,000,000 | | 100% | | 100% | | 100% |
| Maximum | | $250,300,000 | | $150,000,000 | | 123% | | 200% | | 200% |
|
| | | | | | |
| Performance Level | | 2017 EBITDA | | % of 2017 EBITDA Target | | % of Target Payout |
| Threshold | | $200,000,000 | | 65% | | 24% |
| Plan | | $255,000,000 | | 82% | | 50% |
| Target | | $310,000,000 | | 100% | | 100% |
| Maximum | | $440,000,000 | | 142% | | 200% |
In March 2018,February 2021, the Committee determined the achievement of goals and approved final bonus amounts payable under the annual cash bonus award program for 2017. Oceaneering achieved approximately 69% of the 2017 EBITDA target and 100% of the HSEQ target established by the Committee in February 2017, resulting in an approved payout to the Named Executive Officers equal to approximately 26% of target amounts (seeunder the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Annual Cash Bonus Program for 2020 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2020 Annual Cash
Bonus Program | | % of 2020 Adjusted EBITDA Target | | % of 2020 Free Cash Flow Target | | % of 2020
Safety Target | | % of 2020 Overall Target | |
| Performance | | 91% | | 101% | | 109% | | 96% | |
| Payout | | 76% | | 101% | | 109% | | 87% | |
Summary Compensation Table” below).
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Each year since 2006, the Committee has used annual service-based awards of restricted stock units, which are settled in shares of our Common Stock, and performance-based awards of performance units, which are paid (if paid)earned) in cash, as employee compensation elements for our executive officers and other employees. These long-term incentive awards are subject to award agreement terms approved annually by the Committee and vest in the normal course on the third anniversary of the grant date. Further, since 2006 and for the foreseeable future, the Committee has decided to refrain from using annual awards of stock options as an employee compensation element for our executive officers and other employees. Accordingly, no stock options or stock appreciation rights were awarded in 2017. In April 2009, the Committee adopted a policy that Oceaneering would not provide U.S. federal income tax gross-up payments to any of its directors or executive officers in connection with future awards. There are no outstanding incentive awards that provide for tax gross-up payments.
In deciding upon a methodology for determining the elements of our long-term incentive program, theThe Committee established the following objectives:objectives for our long-term incentive program:
•deliver competitive economic value;
•manage annual share utilization;
•preserve the alignment of the executive’s financial and shareholding interest with those of our shareholders, generally;
•attract and retain executives and other key employees;
•focus management attention on specific performance measures that have a strong correlation with the creation of shareholder value; and
•provide that generally at least one-half of an executive’s target total direct compensation, isand approximately 60% of the estimated grant date value of the executive’s long-term incentive awards, be performance-based.
In order to achieve these objectives in 2017,2020, the Committee decided to continue to utilize ourawards of restricted stock units and performance units payable in cash. These long-term incentive program, which delivers value through two vehicles, restricted stock unit awards are subject to award agreement terms approved by the Committee and performance unit awards payablevest in cash.the normal course on the third anniversary of the grant date. The Committee expects to continue its practice of considering a balance of service-based and performance-based, long-term incentive awards in late February or early March of each year, taking into account the Compensation Consultant’s assessment of the alignment of Oceaneering’s incentive structure for executive officers with our compensation philosophy and objectives and the market generally. Long-term incentive awards to new employees or in connection with other events, such as promotions, generally are considered at the time of the next scheduled Committee meeting after the hire date or other event occasioning the consideration of the award.
Since 2006, the Committee has refrained from using annual awards of stock options as an element of employee compensation for our executive officers and other employees. Accordingly, no stock options or stock appreciation rights were awarded in 2020.
In February 2017, performance unit2020, awards payable in cash and service-basedof restricted stock unit awardsunits, settled in shares of our Common Stock, and performance units, payable in cash, were granted to the Named Executive Officers. At the notional value of $100 per performance unit for achievement of performance goals at target level, the performance unitAs in prior years, these awards comprised 59% of the estimated grant date total value of the long-term incentive awards to the Named Executive Officers. The restricted stock units are scheduled to vest in full on the third anniversary of the award date, subject to earlier vesting if the employee meets a specified age, or age and years-of-service, requirement or in the event of the termination or constructive termination of an employee’s employment in connection with a change of control of Oceaneering or due to death or disability. One-thirdAt the notional value of $100 per performance unit for achievement of performance goals at target level, the performance unit awards for 2020 comprised 60% of the 2017 restricted stock unit awardestimated grant-date total value of the 2020 long-term
incentive awards to Mr. Hewlett vested in December 2017, as he met the applicable age and years-of-service requirements. Named Executive Officers (see “Compensation of Executive Officers — Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” below).
2020-2022 Restricted Stock Units
Each restricted stock unit represents the equivalent of one share of our Common Stock but carries no voting or dividend rights. Settlement of vested restricted stock units will be made in shares of our Common Stock, with some shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding requirements, upon the third anniversary of the award date or upon termination of employment for those units vested before the third anniversary of the award date. The aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units awarded to the Named Executive Officers is reflected in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Stock Option Awards” column of the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.
2020-2022 Performance Units
The performance units awarded in February 20172020, as in prior years, are scheduled to vest in full on the third anniversary of the award date, subject to early vesting terms similar to those applicable to the restricted stock unit awards. The Committee approvedCommittee-approved, specific financial goals and measures based 80%for a three-year performance period commencing on Cumulative Three-Year Cash Flow (as defined) and 20% on total shareholder return (as defined, “TSR”) relative to a peer group that is selected by the Committee for the three-year period of January 1 2017 through December 31, 2019of the year awarded. The goals and measures to be used as the basis for determining the final value of the performance units.units awarded in 2020 are based on (1) Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA (as defined) and (2) Total Shareholder Return (as defined, “TSR”), relative to a peer group selected by the Committee in consultation with the Compensation Consultant (“Relative TSR”), for the three-year period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 (the “Performance Period”). Those measures were selected because of the Committee’s belief that they have a strong correlation to the creation of shareholder value. The target amount of Cumulative Three-Year Cash FlowAdjusted EBITDA during thisthe three-year performance periodPerformance Period was selected because it was three times the 20172020 Adjusted EBITDA then expected to be achieved. The amountamounts of Cumulative Three-Year Cash FlowAdjusted EBITDA and relativeRelative TSR over the three-year performance periodPerformance Period necessary to achieve the threshold, target and maximum level goals for these performance measures were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Performance Measures | | Weight | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
Cumulative Three-Year Cash FlowAdjusted EBITDA | | 80% | | $612488 million | | $767610.5 million | | $1.075 billion915.8 million |
| Relative TSR | | 20% | | 30th Percentile | | 50th Percentile | | Above 90th Percentile or Above |
The final value of each performance unit may range from $0 to $200, with the threshold, target and maximum levels of achievement of goals valued at $50, $100 and $200, respectively. The value of vested performance units will be determined by the Committee and payable in cash.
The determination of the final value of each performance unit is based on the application of the following grid, (withwith interpolation between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels)levels (a value of zero is attributed to below-threshold performance of either metric). Regardless of the actual final value determined in accordance with the following grid, if Oceaneering’s TSRTotal Shareholder Return for the Performance Period is negative, then the amount attributable to relativeRelative TSR may not exceed the target level.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA | | Unit Values |
| Maximum | | $160.00 | | $170.00 | | $180.00 | | $200.00 |
| Target | | $80.00 | | $90.00 | | $100.00 | | $120.00 |
| Threshold | | $40.00 | | $50.00 | | $60.00 | | $80.00 |
| Below Threshold | | $0.00 | | $10.00 | | $20.00 | | $40.00 |
| | Below Threshold | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| | Relative TSR |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative Three-Year Cash Flow | | Unit Values |
| Maximum | | $160.00 | | $170.00 | | $180.00 | | $200.00 |
| Target | | $80.00 | | $90.00 | | $100.00 | | $120.00 |
| Threshold | | $40.00 | | $50.00 | | $60.00 | | $80.00 |
| Below Threshold | | $0.00 | | $10.00 | | $20.00 | | $40.00 |
| | | Below Threshold | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| | | Relative TSR |
The estimated future payout of the performance unit awards to Named Executive Officers, if each of the performance measures is achieved at the threshold, target or maximum level, is reflected in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” column of the “Grants“Grants of Plan-Based Awards”Awards” table below.
2018-2020 Performance Units
The review of our cost structure and implementation of operational and cost-improvement initiatives, as Chief Executive Officer was at risk against short- or long-term performance goals,well as Mr. McEvoy did not participate in our 2017 annual or long-term incentive compensation programs for employees. Approximately 58%the operational adjustments we have made to mitigate the effects of the target total direct compensationCOVID-19 pandemic (discussed in “— Pay for Performance” above), have necessarily included workforce reductions and related expenses, and the recognition of Mr. Larson,significant impairment charges and other asset write-downs. In consideration of such measures, beginning with our Chief Executive Officer since May 2017, was at risk against short-performance unit awards in 2019, the Committee has used Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA, rather than Cumulative EBITDA, as a performance metric for the relevant three-year performance periods, due to the Committee’s conclusion that Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA provides a more appropriate and long-termconsistent measure of financial performance goals,than the unadjusted amount. In conjunction with determining the final payouts under our performance units awarded in 2018, the Committee exercised its discretion to use Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA, rather than Cumulative EBITDA, to align the performance metrics for the 2018 performance units with those established for the 2019, 2020 and between approximately 50%2021 performance units.
As we have continued our operational and 55% was at risk for eachcost-improvement initiatives, in alignment with our performance-based incentive programs, our Adjusted EBITDA and Relative TSR performance have improved.The payout of the other2018-2020 performance units reflected Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA for the three-year period at 128% of target and Relative TSR for the period above median, but capped at 100% of target (due to absolute TSR being negative for the performance period), with a weighted overall result of 123% of target or $123 per unit. This is the first time our performance units have been earned above target since 2015.
The final value of the performance units awarded to the Named Executive Officers.Officers in 2018 (excluding Mr. Davison, who joined Oceaneering in 2019) is reflected in cash payments shown in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.
Post-Employment Compensation Programs
Retirement Plans
We maintain a 401(k) plan and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, known as the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”(the “SERP”). All of our employees who meet the eligibility requirements may participate in our 401(k) plan. Each of the Named Executive Officers participated in our 401(k) plan in 2017.2020. Participation in ourthe SERP includes Named Executive Officers and other key employees selected for participation by the Committee. OurThe SERP was established to provide a benefit to our executives and other key employees in excess of Code limits for our 401(k) plan in order to attract and motivate participants to remain with us and provide retirement plan values that are competitive with those provided by companies within the Compensation Peer Group. Under ourthe SERP, we credit each participant’s notional account with a percentage (determined by the Committee) of the participant’s base salary, subject to vesting. A participant may elect to defer a portion of base salary and annual bonus for accrual pursuant to ourthe SERP. Amounts accrued under ourthe SERP are adjusted for earnings and losses as if they were invested in one or more deemed investments selected by the participant from those designated as alternatives by an administrative committee established by our SERP administrative committee.Board (the “U.S. Benefits Administrative Committee”). A participant’s vested interest in the planSERP is generally distributable upon termination. The percentages of base salary credited for our Former Chief Executive Officer and the Named Executive Officers in 20172020 were: Mr. McEvoy – 50%; Mr. Larson – 50% (beginning
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | | SERP Participation (as a Percentage of Base Salary) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 50% |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 30% |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 25% |
| David K. Lawrence | | 20% |
| Eric A. Silva | | 20% |
In 2020, the SERP participation levels for our Named Executive Officers, in May 2017); Mr. Hewlett – 30%; Mr. Curtis – 25%; Mr. Lawrence – 20%; and Mr. Barrett – 20%. These percentages are consistent with the respective percentageseach case as a percentage of base salary, credited from year-end 2016 (except as noted).were generally consistent with those in 2019. Please see the “Non-Qualified“Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table below and accompanying narrative for further information about ourthe SERP and contributions to the Named Executive Officers’ accounts.
Change-of-Control Agreements
We have entered into change-of-control agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers and certain other officers, which we refer to as “Change-of-Control Agreements.” We also previously hadIn 2018, we adopted a change-of-control plan (the “CoC Plan”) for executive officers and other key employees who were not previously parties to change-of-control agreements with us, in order to streamline the process of providing change-of-control protections to executive officers and other key employees on a going-forward basis. Mr. Davison entered into a participation agreement under the CoC Plan upon his employment in 2019. The pre-existing change-of-control agreements with our other Named Executive Officers (the “Legacy CoC Agreements”) have remained in place with our Former Chief Executive Officer, which effectively terminated upon his retirementand would be applicable in May 2017.the event of a change-of-control situation. The provisions of the Change-of-Control Agreements did not influence and were not influenced by the other elements of compensation, as the change-of-control payments and benefits serve different objectives, and due to the fact that a change-of-control triggering event may never occur.
We generally limit eligibility for Change-of-Control Agreement participation to senior officers whose full support and sustained contribution would be important to the successful completion of a change of control. We believe the benefits provided by the Change-of-Control Agreements help promote long-term retention and focus on the best interests of Oceaneering and our shareholders, by providing some financial security to these officers against the risk of loss of employment that could result followingin connection with a change of control of our company. Each Change-of-Control Agreement entitles the individual to receive a severance package, described below, in the event of the occurrence of both a change of control and a termination of the individual’s employment by us without cause (as defined below) or by the individual for good reason (as defined below) during a specified period of time beginning a year prior to the occurrence or, in some cases, the contemplation by the Board of a change of control (the “Effective Date”) and ending two years following the Effective Date. For purposes of the Change-of-Control Agreements, a change of control is defined as occurring if:
any person is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of our securities representing 20% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding voting securities, other than through the purchase of voting securities directly from a private placement by us;
the current members of our Board, or subsequent members approved by at least two-thirds of the current members, no longer comprise a majority of our Board;
our company is merged or consolidated with another corporation or entity, and our shareholders own less than 60% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting corporation or entity;
there has been a consummation of either a tender offer or exchange offer by a person other than us for the ownership of 20% or more of our voting securities; or
there has been a disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.
As defined in each Change-of-Control Agreement, cause for termination by Oceaneering means conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction, from which conviction no further appeal can be taken, of a felony-grade crime involving moral turpitude related to service with us.
As defined in each Change-of-Control Agreement, good reason for termination by the executive includes:
any adverse change in status, title, duties or responsibilities;
any reduction in annual base salary, SERP contribution level by us, annual bonus opportunity or aggregate long-term compensation, all as may be increased subsequent to date of the Change-of-Control Agreement;
any relocation;
the failure of a successor to assume the Change-of-Control Agreement;
any prohibition by us against the individual engaging in outside activities permitted by the Change-of-Control Agreement;
any purported termination by us that does not comply with the terms of the Change-of-Control Agreement; or
any default by us in the performance of our obligations under the Change-of-Control Agreement.thereafter.
The severance package provided for in each Change-of-Control Agreement consists of an amount equal to a multiple (three, in the case of Mr. Larson, and two, in the case of each of our other Named Executive Officers) timesof the sum of:
his•the officer’s highest annual rate of base salary during the then-current year or any of the three years preceding the year of termination;salary;
•an amount equal to the target award the Named Executive Officer is eligible to receive under the then-current annual bonus program;Annual Cash Bonus Program; and
•in the case of Mr. Larson, an amount equal to the maximum percentage of his annual base salary contributed by us for him in our SERP for the then-current year multiplied by his highest annual rate of base salary.salary during the then-current year or any of the three years preceding the date of termination.
The severance provisions (in the relevant Change-of-Control Agreement or applicable long-term incentive award agreement) also generally provide that, for each Named Executive Officer:
•the benefits under all compensation plans and programs, including restricted stock agreements, restricted stock unit agreements and performance unit agreements, would be paid as if all contingencies for payment and maximum levels of performance had been met; and
he•the officer would receive, at no greater cost or expense to such officer than was the case immediately prior to the change of control: (a) under the officer’s Legacy CoC Agreement, benefits under all other plans and programs hein which the officer then participates in for three years (in the case of Mr. Larson) or two years (in the case of each of our other Named Executive Officers)Officers other than Mr. Davison); or (b) under the CoC Plan, one year of post-employment health insurance benefits (in the case of Mr. Davison).
The Change-of-ControlLegacy CoC Agreements provide that, if any payments made thereunder would cause the recipient to be liable for an excise tax because the payment is a parachute payment, and the amount of the parachute payment, reduced by all federal, state and local taxes applicable thereto, including excise tax imposed pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code, were less than the amount the individual would receive if he or she were paid three times his or her “base amount,” as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code, less $1.00 (the “safe-harbor amount”), reduced by all federal, state and local taxes applicable thereto, then the aggregate of the amounts constituting the parachute payment would be reduced to the safe-harbor amount. The CoC Plan provides, however, that if the after-tax benefit of the reduced payment described above does not exceed the after-tax benefit if the payments are not so reduced, then the payments will not be reduced to the safe-harbor amount (and the recipient will pay the excise tax). (Please see “Compensation of Executive Officers — Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” below.)
Retention and Severance Payments Agreement
We entered into a Retention and Severance Payments Agreement with Mr. Davison, effective upon his employment as Oceaneering’s Chief Operating Officer on June 3, 2019 (the “Retention Agreement”), to restore a portion of the compensation opportunity lost when he joined Oceaneering and to help promote his long-term retention and focus on the best interests of Oceaneering and our shareholders. The Retention Agreement provides for: (1) a retention bonus in the amount of $1,000,000 (the “Retention Payment”), which was paid on the first anniversary of Mr. Davison’s employment date; and (2) a severance amount equal to two times the total of his annual base salary and target payment under the annual cash bonus program in effect as of his termination date (the “Severance Payment”), payable in the event of a qualifying termination of employment prior to the third anniversary of Mr. Davison’s employment date. In exchange, Mr. Davison agreed to certain conditions of payment and restrictive covenants, including confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition provisions as set forth in the Retention Agreement.
Mr. Davison will not be eligible for the Severance Payment if, prior to the third anniversary of his employment date, he becomes eligible for a severance payment under the participation agreement awarded to him under the CoC Plan described above. A qualifying termination for purposes of the Retention Payment and Severance Payment is a termination of employment: (a) by Oceaneering other than for cause (as defined in the CoC Plan); (b) by Mr. Davison for good reason (as defined in the CoC Plan); or (c) due to his death or disability (as defined in the CoC Plan). The provisions of the Retention Agreement did not influence and were not influenced by the other elements of compensation, as the Retention Payment and Severance Payment serve different objectives and due to the fact that an event triggering such a payment may never occur. (Please see “Compensation of Executive Officers — Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control” below for definitions of the terms “cause,” “disability” and “good reason.”)
Perquisites
We provide executive officers with perquisites and other benefits that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to enable us to attract and retain employees for key positions. The Committee periodically
reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our executive officers. The perquisites provided to the Named Executive Officers in 20172020 and our incremental cost to provide those perquisites are set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” below and the related footnotes to that table.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To align the interests of our directors, executive officers and shareholders, we believe our directors and executive officers should have a significant financial stake in Oceaneering. To further that goal, our Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines requiring that our nonemployee directors and designated officers maintain minimum ownership interests in Oceaneering relative to the cash retainer generally paid to nonemployee directors (“Retainer”) or current annual base salary of the officer (“Base Salary”). Under the guidelines, we expect each of our nonemployee directors and senior officers to own a number of shares of our Common Stock having a market value or cost basis, whichever is greater, that is not less than a multiple of the Retainer or Base Salary as provided in the following table.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Level | | Multiple of Retainer or Base Salary |
| Nonemployee Directors | | 5 |
| Chief Executive Officer | | 5 |
President, Chief Operating Officer Executive Vice President and Corporate Senior Vice Presidents | | 3 |
| Other Senior Vice Presidents | | 2 |
The following forms of ownership are recognized in determining the number of shares of our Common Stock owned by a nonemployee director or executive officer for purposes of satisfying the stock ownership guidelines:
•direct ownership of shares;
•indirect ownership of shares, including stock or stock equivalents held in our retirement plan; and
•vested and unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded under our long-term incentive programs.
Each nonemployee director and officer has five years from the date of his or her initial election or appointment to comply with the stock ownership guidelines. In the event that a nonemployee director or officer does not meet the stock ownership level within the specified time period, he or she will be prohibited from selling any stock acquired through vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units, or upon exercise of stock options, except to pay for applicable taxes or the exercise price, until he or she satisfies the requirements. Each of our current nonemployee directors and Named Executive Officers is covered by this policy and currently satisfies the stock ownership guidelines applicable to him or is within the period allowed to achieve compliance.
Prohibitions on Derivatives Trading, Hedging, etc.
Oceaneering maintains a policy that prohibits all of its directors, officers and employees, including the Named Executive Officers, from (i)(1) engaging in “short sales” or trading in puts, calls or other options on our Common Stock, (ii)(2) engaging in hedging transactions involving our Common Stock and (iii)(3) holding shares of our Common Stock in a margin account or pledging shares of our Common Stock as collateral for a loan.
Clawback Policy
Our Board has adopted a clawback policy applicable to executive officer incentive compensation. The policy provides that, if the consolidated financial statements of Oceaneering are materially restated within three years of the first public release or filing with the SEC of such financial statements, and the Compensation Committee determines, in its discretion, that any executive officer has engaged in intentional misconduct, and such misconduct caused or partially caused the need for such restatement, then the Compensation Committee may, within 12 months after such a material restatement, require that the executive officer forfeit and/or return to Oceaneering all or a portion of the compensation vested, awarded or received under any bonus award, equity award or other award during each of the period subject to restatement and the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC of the financial statements that were restated. The forfeiture and/or return of compensation under the policy would be limited to any portion that the executive officer would not have received if the consolidated financial statements had been reported properly at the time of their first public release or filing with the SEC. The clawback policy would not apply to restatements where the need for restatement is determined following the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in our Incentive Plan), and the policy does not limit the ability of Oceaneering to pursue forfeiture or reclamation of amounts under applicable law.
Tax Deductibility of Pay
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a deduction to public companies for annual compensation over $1 million paid to a chief executive officer and certain other executive officers (“covered employees”). However, for 2017 and prior years, anyPrior to 2018, compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and other covered employees that met the Section 162(m) requirements of qualified“qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)compensation” was not subject to this deduction limitation. Following the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”),Effective for our taxable year beginning with theJanuary 1, 2018, calendar year, the $1-million annual deduction limitation under Section 162(m) applieswas amended to compensation paid to any individual who serves aseliminate the chief executive officer, chief financial officer or qualifies as one of the other three most highly compensated executive officers in 2017 or any later calendar year; there is no longer any exception for qualified performance-based compensation. Our 2017 cash bonus and performance unit programs (along with our 2016 and 2015 performance unit programs) were intendedcompensation, subject to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Although we can provide no assurance, given the current lack of IRS guidance on the matter, we believe the TCJA transition rulesrelief for binding contractscertain grandfathered arrangements in effect onas of November 2, 2017 should continue to allow
performance unit awards that will be paid after 2017 to maintain their exemption from the $1-million annual deduction limitation as long as such grants are not materially modified (“grandfathered amounts”). We are reviewing the status of the 2017 cash bonus award program under the TCJA. Our general policy, where consistent with business objectives, has been to preserve the deductibility of compensation to executive officers. However, we may authorize forms of compensation that might not be deductible, if we believe they are in the best interests of Oceaneering and our shareholders. Our 2017 service-based restricted stock unit awards are not considered performance-based under Section 162(m) and, accordingly, are subject to the $1-million limit on deductibility. All or a portion of the value, when vested, of these restricted stock unit awards may not be deductible.
For periods after 2017, without the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m), it is expected that any compensation deductions (other than grandfathered amounts) for any individual who is our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or one of our other three most highly compensated executive officers in 2017 or any later year will be subject to a $1-million annual deduction limitation.2017. Although the deductibility of compensation is a consideration evaluated by the Committee, the Committee believes it is important to preserve flexibility in designing compensation programs and that the lost deduction on compensation payable in excess of the $1-million limitation for the named executive officers isNamed Executive Officers who are covered employees does not material relative tooutweigh the benefit of being able to attract and retain talented management. Accordingly, the Committee will continue to retain the discretion to approve compensation that is subject to the $1-million deductibility limit.
Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A
Section 409A of the Code can impose significant additional taxes on the recipient of “nonqualified deferred compensation” arrangements that do not meet specified requirements regarding both form and operation. Some of
the arrangements between Oceaneering and its executive officers and other employees provide, or might be considered to provide, nonqualified deferred compensation. We seek to ensure that our compensation arrangements are either exempt from or comply with Section 409A.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement with the management of Oceaneering International, Inc., and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of Oceaneering that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
|
| | | | |
| Compensation Committee |
| Deanna L. Goodwin, Chair
William B. Berry Chairman
Jon Erik Reinhardsen
Steven A. Webster
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who served as our principal financial officer through December 31, 2017,2020, and our three other most highly paid executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. We refer to these persons as the Named Executive Officers. The table also summarizes the compensation of our Former Chief Executive Officer through his retirement as an Oceaneering employee in May 2017.
Summary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position
as of December 31, 2020 | | Year | | Salary
($) | | Bonus
($)(2) | | Stock Awards
($)(3) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4) | | All Other
Compensation
($)(5)(6) | | Total
($) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 2020 | | 683,689 | | | — | | | 1,104,042 | | | 3,069,151 | | | 394,867 | | | 5,251,749 | |
| President and Chief | | 2019 | | 721,000 | | | — | | | 1,286,151 | | | 1,217,794 | | | 405,260 | | | 3,630,205 | |
| Executive Officer | | 2018 | | 700,000 | | | — | | | 1,120,554 | | | 411,072 | | | 393,463 | | | 2,625,089 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 2020 | | 578,497 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 474,038 | | | 503,929 | | | 231,227 | | | 2,787,691 | |
| Chief Operating Officer (1) | | 2019 | | 360,110 | | | — | | | 1,817,776 | | | 370,845 | | | 139,176 | | | 2,687,907 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 2020 | | 398,417 | | | — | | | 359,124 | | | 859,675 | | | 138,832 | | | 1,756,048 | |
| Senior Vice President and | | 2019 | | 406,065 | | | — | | | 402,426 | | | 366,582 | | | 138,622 | | | 1,313,695 | |
| Chief Financial Officer | | 2018 | | 369,150 | | | — | | | 288,900 | | | 130,069 | | | 127,723 | | | 915,842 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 2020 | | 349,898 | | | — | | | 229,377 | | | 714,447 | | | 111,037 | | | 1,404,759 | |
| Senior Vice President, General | | 2019 | | 363,825 | | | — | | | 274,021 | | | 325,542 | | | 109,394 | | | 1,072,782 | |
| Counsel and Secretary | | 2018 | | 346,500 | | | — | | | 234,198 | | | 113,949 | | | 106,476 | | | 801,123 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Eric A. Silva | | 2020 | | 348,964 | | | — | | | 171,567 | | | 562,424 | | | 111,004 | | | 1,193,959 | |
| Senior Vice President and Chief | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transformation Officer (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)No information is reported for Mr. Davison for 2018, or for Mr. Silva for 2019 or 2018, as each was not a named executive officer under the rules of the SEC for those years.
(2)No discretionary bonuses were awarded to the Named Executive Officers for the indicated years, other than a retention bonus paid to Mr. Davison in 2020 pursuant to the Retention Agreement entered into upon his employment in 2019 (see “Retention and Severance Payments Agreement” under the heading “— Executive Compensation Table Components — Post-Employment Compensation” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position
as of December 31, 2017 | | Year | | Salary
($) | | Bonus
($)(4) | | Stock Awards
($)(5) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(6) | | All Other
Compensation
($)(7)(8) | | Total
($) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 2017 | | 650,685 |
| | — |
| | 1,303,332 |
| | 213,807 |
| | 344,615 |
| | 2,512,439 |
|
| President and Chief Executive | | 2016 | | 550,000 |
| | — |
| | 617,260 |
| | 607,500 |
| | 251,932 |
| | 2,026,692 |
|
| Officer (1) | | 2015 | | 550,000 |
| | — |
| | 628,800 |
| | 1,056,807 |
| | 238,266 |
| | 2,473,873 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | 2017 | | 244,863 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 162,672 |
| | 407,535 |
|
| Former Chief Executive | | 2016 | | 715,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,982,435 |
| | 2,250,000 |
| | 406,689 |
| | 5,354,124 |
|
| Officer (2) | | 2015 | | 715,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,001,680 |
| | 3,914,100 |
| | 412,085 |
| | 7,042,865 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 2017 | | 432,000 |
| | — |
| | 481,462 |
| | 113,560 |
| | 164,525 |
| | 1,191,547 |
|
| Chief Operating Officer | | 2016 | | 432,000 |
| | — |
| | 462,945 |
| | 390,000 |
| | 163,516 |
| | 1,448,461 |
|
| | | 2015 | | 384,000 |
| | — |
| | 471,600 |
| | 652,350 |
| | 154,501 |
| | 1,662,451 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 2017 | | 345,000 |
| | — |
| | 295,785 |
| | 68,018 |
| | 118,431 |
| | 827,234 |
|
| Senior Vice President and | | 2016 | | 300,000 |
| | — |
| | 246,915 |
| | 75,000 |
| | 106,050 |
| | 727,965 |
|
| Chief Financial Officer (3) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 2017 | | 330,000 |
| | — |
| | 254,616 |
| | 60,723 |
| | 99,872 |
| | 745,211 |
|
| Senior Vice President, General | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Counsel and Secretary (3) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 2017 | | 325,000 |
| | — |
| | 278,615 |
| | 59,803 |
| | 77,531 |
| | 740,949 |
|
| Senior Vice President, | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Business Development (3)
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
(1) | On May 5, 2017, Mr. Larson, who was already serving as our President, was appointed to the additional position of Chief Executive Officer. |
| |
(2) | Mr. McEvoy retired as our Chief Executive Officer on May 5, 2017 and ceased to be an employee. See “Compensation of Nonemployee Directors” below for details of additional 2017 compensation received by Mr. McEvoy in his capacity as a nonemployee director. |
| |
(3) | No information is reported for Mr. Curtis for 2015, or for Messrs. Barrett and Lawrence for 2016 or 2015, as each was not a named executive officer under the rules of the SEC for those years. |
| |
(4) | No discretionary bonuses were awarded to the Named Executive Officers for the indicated year(s). |
| |
(5) | The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair values of awards of restricted stock units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. |
| |
(6) | The amounts shown for 2017 are comprised of annual bonus payments made under our Annual Cash Bonus Award Program for 2017 (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash” above). No cash payments were made pursuant to performance units awarded in 2015, as the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold level of performance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 was not attained for either average return on invested capital or cumulative cash flow. |
(4)The amounts shown for 2016 were2020 are comprised of the following for each Named Executive Officer: (a) annual bonus payments made pursuant to our Annual Cash Bonus Award Program for 2020: Mr. Larson – $744,451; Mr. Davison – $503,929; Mr. Curtis – $260,296; Mr. Lawrence – $228,597; and Mr. Silva – $227,987 (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash” above); and (b) except for Mr. Davison, who joined Oceaneering in 2019, cash payoutspayments made pursuant to performance units awarded in 20142018, having a final value of $75.00$123 per unit, as determined by the Compensation Committee determined that thein February 2020, based on performance measures for the period offrom January 1, 20142018 through December 31, 2016,2020, reflecting Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA for the three-year period between the target and maximum levels and Relative TSR above target, but capped at target (due to absolute TSR being negative), resulting in a final value at between target and maximum levels. The use of Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA for these purposes reflected the change in metric from Cumulative EBITDA discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation — 2018-2020 Performance Units” above.
The amounts shown for 2019 were attainedcomprised of the following for each Named Executive Officer: (a) annual bonus payments made pursuant to our Annual Cash Bonus Award Program for 2019: Mr. Larson – $839,794; Mr. Davison – $370,845; Mr. Curtis – $283,782; and Mr. Lawrence – $254,262 (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash” above); and (b) except for Mr. Davison, who joined Oceaneering in 2019, cash payments made pursuant to performance units awarded in 2017, having a final value of $20 per unit, as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2020, based on performance for the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019 at the maximum level for return on invested capitalbetween threshold and target levels, reflecting cumulative three-year EBITDA below the threshold and relative TSR at between threshold and target levels.
The amounts shown for cumulative cash flow. No2018 were comprised of annual bonus payments were made under our Annual Cash Bonus Award Program for 2016.
The amounts shown for 20152018. No cash payments were comprised of cash payoutsmade pursuant to performance units awarded in 2013 of $130.47 per unit,2016, as the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold level of performance measures for the period offrom January 1, 20132016 through December 31, 2015, were2018, was not attained at the maximum level for either average return on invested capital or cumulative EBITDA.
(5)The amount included for each attributable perquisite or personal benefit does not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and betweenpersonal benefits received by any Named Executive Officer.
(6)The amounts shown for 2020 are attributable to the target and maximum levels for cumulative cash flow. No annual bonus payments were made under our Annual Cash Bonus Award Program for 2015.following:
| |
(7) | The amount included for each attributable perquisite or personal benefit does not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received by any Named Executive Officer. |
| |
(8) | The amounts shown for 2017 are attributable to the following: |
•Mr. Larson: (i) $306,667(a) $338,750 for our contribution to his notional SERP account; (ii) $16,200(b) $17,100 for our contribution to his 401(k) plan account; (iii) $2,174(c) $2,040 for basic life insurance premium; and (iv) $19,574(d) $33,391 for perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: provision of excess liability insurance; premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan; use of sporting event tickets; use of a company-leased hunting camp; and use of a company-provided automobile;
•Mr. McEvoy: (i) $126,614Davison: (a) $173,600 for our contribution to his notional SERP account; (ii) $16,200(b) $14,000 for our contribution to his 401(k) plan account; (iii) $901(c) $1,750 for basic life insurance premium; and (iv) $18,957 for perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: provision of excess liability insurance; premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan; club membership; and use of sporting event tickets;
Mr. Hewlett: (i) $129,600 for our contribution to his notional SERP account; (ii) $16,200 for our contribution to his 401(k) plan account; (iii) $1,445 for basic life insurance premium; and (iv) $17,280(d) $38,820 for perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: provision of excess liability insurance; premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan; and club membership;
•Mr. Curtis: (i) $86,250(a) $99,197 for our contribution to his notional SERP account; (ii) $16,200(b) $17,100 for our contribution to his 401(k) plan account; (iii) $1,123(c) $1,195 for basic life insurance premium; and (iv) $14,858(d) $17,519 for perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: provision of excess liability insurance; and premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan;
•Mr. Lawrence: (i) $66,000(a) $69,814 for our contribution to his notional SERP account; (ii) $16,200(b) $17,100 for our contribution to his 401(k) plan account; (iii) $1,083(c) $1,053 for basic life insurance premium; and (iv) $16,589(d) $17,951 for perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: provision of excess liability insurance; and premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan; and use of sporting event tickets; and
•Mr. Barrett: (i) $65,000Silva: (a) $69,514 for our contribution to his notional SERP account; (ii) $9,750(b) $17,100 for our contribution to his 401(k) plan account; and (iii) $1,087(c) $1,048 for basic life insurance premium; and (iv) $1,694(d) $18,251 for perquisites and other personal benefits.benefits comprised of: provision of: excess liability insurance; and premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan.
The following table provides information about the equity and non-equity awards to the Named Executive Officers under our Incentive Plan during the year ended December 31, 2017. Our Former Chief Executive did not participate in our 2017 annual or long-term incentive compensation programs for employees. See “Compensation of Nonemployee Directors” below for details regarding Mr. McEvoy’s compensation as a nonemployee director.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information about the equity and non-equity awards to the Named Executive Officers under our Incentive Plan during the year ended December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Grant Date | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards | | All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(3) | | Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock Awards
(4) |
Threshold
($) | | Target
($) | | Maximum
($) | |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 2/27/2020 | (1) | 1,083,000 | | | 2,166,000 | | | 4,332,000 | | | 107,922 | | | $ | 1,104,042 | |
| | 2/27/2020 | (2) | 192,288 | | | 854,611 | | | 1,649,400 | | | | | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 2/27/2020 | (1) | 465,000 | | | 930,000 | | | 1,860,000 | | | 46,338 | | | $ | 474,038 | |
| | 2/27/2020 | (2) | 130,162 | | | 578,497 | | | 1,116,499 | | | | | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 2/27/2020 | (1) | 352,300 | | | 704,600 | | | 1,409,200 | | | 35,105 | | | $ | 359,124 | |
| | 2/27/2020 | (2) | 67,233 | | | 298,813 | | | 576,709 | | | | | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 2/27/2020 | (1) | 225,000 | | | 450,000 | | | 900,000 | | | 22,422 | | | $ | 229,377 | |
| | 2/27/2020 | (2) | 59,045 | | | 262,424 | | | 506,477 | | | | | |
| Eric A. Silva | | 2/27/2020 | (1) | 168,300 | | | 336,600 | | | 673,200 | | | 16,771 | | | $ | 171,567 | |
| | 2/27/2020 | (2) | 58,888 | | | 261,723 | | | 505,125 | | | | | |
(1)The amounts presented show the potential value of the payout for each Named Executive Officer under the performance units awarded in 2020 if the threshold, target or maximum goal is satisfied for each of the performance measures. The potential payouts are performance-driven and, therefore, at risk. For a description of the awards, including business measurements for the three-year performance period and the performance goals for determining the payout, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation — 2020-2022 Performance Units” above.
(2)The amounts presented show the possible threshold, target and maximum bonus amounts that could have been payable under our 2020 Annual Cash Bonus Award Program. These amounts are computed based on various percentages of base salary, after giving effect to the voluntary reductions in salary discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Annual Base Salary.” For a discussion of the program and related 2020 results, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash.”
(3)The amounts reflect the number of restricted stock units awarded to the Named Executive Officers in 2020. For a description of the awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation — 2020-2022 Restricted Stock Units” above.
(4)The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units computed under FASB ASC Topic 718 awarded to the Named Executive Officers in 2020. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. For a description of the awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation — 2020-2022 Restricted Stock Units” above.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Grant Date | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards | | All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(4) | | Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock Awards
(5) |
Threshold
($) | | Target
($) | | Maximum
($) | |
| Roderick A. Larson (1) | | 2/24/2017 | (2) | 945,000 |
| | 1,890,000 |
| | 3,780,000 |
| | 47,856 |
| | $ | 1,303,332 |
|
| | | 2/24/2017 | (3) | 195,206 |
| | 813,356 |
| | 1,626,713 |
| | | | |
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 2/24/2017 | (2) | 336,950 |
| | 673,900 |
| | 1,347,800 |
| | 16,852 |
| | $ | 481,462 |
|
| | | 2/24/2017 | (3) | 103,680 |
| | 432,000 |
| | 864,000 |
| | | | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 2/24/2017 | (2) | 207,000 |
| | 414,000 |
| | 828,000 |
| | 10,353 |
| | $ | 295,785 |
|
| | | 2/24/2017 | (3) | 62,100 |
| | 258,750 |
| | 517,500 |
| | | | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 2/24/2017 | (2) | 178,200 |
| | 356,400 |
| | 712,800 |
| | 8,912 |
| | $ | 254,616 |
|
| | | 2/24/2017 | (3) | 55,440 |
| | 231,000 |
| | 462,000 |
| | | | |
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 2/24/2017 | (2) | 195,000 |
| | 390,000 |
| | 780,000 |
| | 9,752 |
| | $ | 278,615 |
|
| | | 2/24/2017 | (3) | 54,600 |
| | 227,500 |
| | 455,000 |
| | | | |
| |
(1) | Mr. Larson received an initial 2017 award on the date shown and, upon his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, a supplemental award in May 2017, on the same vesting schedule and other terms. |
| |
(2) | The amounts presented show the potential value of the payout for each Named Executive Officer under the performance units awarded in 2017 if the threshold, target or maximum goal is satisfied for each of the performance measures. The potential payouts are performance-driven and, therefore, at risk. For a description of the awards, including business measurements for the three-year performance period and the performance goals for determining the payout, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above. |
| |
(3) | The amounts presented show the possible threshold, target and maximum bonus amounts that could have been payable under our 2017 Annual Cash Bonus Award Program. As the threshold performance for awards to the Named Executive Officers under the program was not attained, no bonus payments relating to such awards were approved. For a discussion of the program and related 2017 results, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Incentive Awards Paid in Cash.” |
| |
(4) | The amounts reflect the number of restricted stock units awarded to the Named Executive Officers in 2017. For a description of the awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above. |
| |
(5) | The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units computed under FASB ASC Topic 718 awarded to the Named Executive Officers in 2017. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. For a description of the awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information on the current holdings of unvested restricted stock units for the Named Executive Officers and our Former Chief Executive Officer as of December 31, 2017.2020. There were no outstanding stock options held by the Named Executive Officers or our Former Chief Executive Officer in 2017.2020.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Stock Awards |
Number
of Shares or Units
of Stock That Have
Not Vested (1) | | Market Value
of Shares or Units
of Stock That Have
Not Vested (2) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 253,421 | | | $ | 2,014,697 | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 137,410 | | | $ | 1,092,410 | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 77,202 | | | $ | 613,756 | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 20,860 | | | $ | 165,837 | |
| Eric A. Silva | | 39,429 | | | $ | 313,461 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Name | | Stock Awards |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (1) | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (2) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 81,980 |
| | $ | 1,733,057 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | 23,685 |
| | $ | 500,701 |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 16,766 |
| | $ | 354,433 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | 26,483 |
| | $ | 559,851 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | 20,287 |
| | $ | 428,867 |
|
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 26,770 |
| | $ | 565,918 |
|
| |
(1) | (1)Reflects unvested restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Agreements entered into with the Named Executive Officers and our Former Chief Executive in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The vesting schedule for these restricted stock units is as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | 2015
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | 2016
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | 2017
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | Total |
| 2/19/2018 | | 12/15/2018 | | 2/18/2019 | | 12/15/2018 | | 12/15/2019 | | 2/24/2020 | | (# of Units) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 12,000 |
| | — |
| | 22,124 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47,856 |
| | 81,980 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | — |
| | 23,685 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,685 |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | — |
| | 5,531 |
| | — |
| | 5,618 |
| | 5,617 |
| | — |
| | 16,766 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | 7,280 |
| | — |
| | 8,850 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,353 |
| | 26,483 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | 4,000 |
| | — |
| | 7,375 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,912 |
| | 20,287 |
|
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 7,800 |
| | — |
| | 9,218 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,752 |
| | 26,770 |
|
| |
(2) | Market value of unvested restricted stock units assumes a price of $21.14 per share of our Common Stock as of December 29, 2017 (the last trading day on the NYSE in 2017), which was the closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by the NYSE, on that date. |
The following table provides information for the Named Executive Officers in 2018, 2019 and our Former Chief Executive Officer on2020, including the numberagreement providing for the special one-time award to Mr. Davison of shares acquired during 2017 following vesting of83,580 restricted stock unit awards andunits granted upon his employment date (the “Sign-on Award”). The vesting schedules for these restricted stock units are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | 2018
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | 2019
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | 2020
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | Total |
| 3/1/2021 | | 12/15/2021 | | 2/28/2022 | | 12/15/2021 | | 12/15/2022 | | 2/27/2023 | | (# of Units) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 62,253 | | | — | | | 83,246 | | | — | | | — | | | 107,922 | | | 253,421 | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 16,050 | | | — | | | 26,047 | | | — | | | — | | | 35,105 | | | 77,202 | |
| David K. Lawrence | | — | | | 5,912 | | | — | | | 7,474 | | | 7,474 | | | — | | | 20,860 | |
| Eric A. Silva | | 8,955 | | | — | | | 13,703 | | | — | | | — | | | 16,771 | | | 39,429 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Sign-on
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | 2019
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | 2020
Agreement
(# of Units)
Vesting Date | | Total |
| Name | 6/3/2021 | | 12/15/2021 | | 2/28/2022 | | 12/15/2021 | | 12/15/2022 | | 2/27/2023 | | (# of Units) |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 63,405 | | | — | | | 27,667 | | | — | | | — | | | 46,338 | | | 137,410 | |
(2)Market value of unvested restricted stock units assumes a price of $7.95 per share of our Common Stock as of December 31, 2020, which was the value realized. There were no outstanding stock options heldclosing price of our Common Stock, as reported by the Named Executive Officers or our Former Chief Executive Officer in 2017.NYSE, on that date.
Stock Vested
The following table provides information for the Named Executive Officers on the number of shares acquired during 2020 following vesting of restricted stock unit awards and the value realized. There were no outstanding stock options held by the Named Executive Officers in 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Stock Awards |
Number of Shares
Acquired after Vesting | | Value Realized on
Settlement (1) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 47,856 | | | $ | 620,692 | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | 20,175 | | | $ | 129,725 | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 10,353 | | | $ | 134,278 | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 8,912 | | | $ | 115,589 | |
| Eric A. Silva | | 5,673 | | | $ | 73,579 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Name | | Stock Awards |
Number of Shares Acquired after Vesting | | Value Realized on Settlement (1) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 9,820 |
| | $ | 267,104 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | 27,000 |
| | $ | 734,400 |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 5,700 |
| | $ | 155,040 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | 1,265 |
| | $ | 34,408 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | 3,245 |
| | $ | 88,264 |
|
| Stephen P. Barrett | | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| |
(1) | The amounts reflect the gross value realized for shares acquired after vesting of restricted stock units, pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Agreements entered into in 2014 with the Named Executive Officers and our Former Chief Executive Officer, at a price of $27.20 per share of our Common Stock as of February 20, 2017, which was the closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by the NYSE, on that date. |
(1)Except with respect to Mr. Davison (whose employment began in 2019), the amounts reflect the gross value realized for shares acquired after vesting of restricted stock units, pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Agreements entered into in 2017 with the indicated Named Executive Officers, at a price of $12.97 per share of our Common Stock as of February 24, 2020, which was the closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by the NYSE, on the preceding trading day. For Mr. Davison, the amount reflects the gross value realized for shares acquired after vesting of restricted stock units, pursuant to the Sign-on Award, at a price of $6.43 per share of our Common Stock as of June 3, 2020, which was the closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by the NYSE, on the preceding trading day.
We do not provide a Pension Benefits Table because we have no qualified pension plan or other plan that would be reportable under the SEC’s rules applicable to Pension Benefits Tables.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Our SERP is an unfunded, defined contribution plan for selected executives and key employees of Oceaneering, including the Named Executive Officers. Pursuant to our SERP, U.S. participants, including the Named Executive Officers, may defer up to 85% of their base salaries and 90% of their annual cash bonus amounts. We credit a participant’s notional account with a determined percentage of the participant’s base salary, subject to vesting. Benefits under our SERP are based on the participant’s vested portion of his or her notional account balance at the time of termination of employment. A participant vests in one-third of our credited amounts each year, subject to accelerated vesting upon the soonest to occur of: (i)(1) the date the participant has completed ten years of participation; (ii)(2) the date that the sum of the participant’s age and years of participation equals 65; (iii)(3) the date of termination of employment by reason of death or disability; and (iv)(4) the date of termination of employment within two years following a change of control. Messrs. Hewlett, Curtis, Lawrence and LawrenceSilva are fully vested in their SERP accounts. All participants, including Messrs. Larson and Barrett,Davison, are fully vested in deferred base salary and bonus. In 2017, Mr. McEvoy received full payment for the balance of his SERP account following his retirement in May 2017.
Amounts accrued under the SERP are adjusted for earnings and losses as if invested in one or more deemed investments selected by the participants from those designated as alternatives by the SERP administrativeU.S. Benefits Administrative Committee, a management committee the members of which are selected by our Board. The deemed investment vehicles are a variety of mutual fund variable accounts. Participants may reallocate their notional accounts within that group of mutual fund variable accounts by notifying the third-party administrative agent of our SERP. The administrative agent adjusts each participant’s account with any hypothetical income, gain or loss and any payments or distributions attributable to such account on a daily basis, or at such other times as the administrative agent determines, based on the performance of the specific deemed investments selected from time to time by the participant. We do not provide any “above market or preferential earnings” (as defined by SEC rules) on any amount of deferred compensation pursuant to our SERP or otherwise.
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, as reported by the administrative agent of our SERP, the deemed investment options available pursuant to our SERP generated hypothetical annual returns (losses) ranging from (1.7)%72.6% to 38.8%(3.3)%.
The following table provides information on our non-qualifiednonqualified deferred compensation plan. Amounts shown are entirely attributable to our SERP.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Executive
Contributions
in 2020 ($) | | Company Contributions in 2020 ($)(1) | | Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in 2020 ($)(2) | | Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($) | | Aggregate Balance at 12/31/2020 ($)(3) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 269,897 | | | 338,750 | | | 861,567 | | | — | | | 4,368,963 | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | — | | | 173,600 | | | 48,669 | | | — | | | 337,350 | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | — | | | 99,197 | | | (194,842) | | | — | | | 2,358,090 | |
| David K. Lawrence | | — | | | 69,814 | | | 151,931 | | | — | | | 1,360,365 | |
| Eric A. Silva | | — | | | 69,514 | | | 84,775 | | | — | | | 595,145 | |
(1)The amounts reflect the credited contributions we made to the accounts of the Named Executive Officers in 2020. All of the contributions shown are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Executive
Contributions
in 2017 ($) | | Company
Contributions
in 2017 ($)(1) | | Aggregate
Earnings (Losses)
in 2017 ($)(2) | | Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($) | | Aggregate Balance
at 12/31/2017 ($)(3) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | — |
| | 306,667 |
| | 175,041 |
| | — |
| | 1,803,617 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | — |
| | 126,614 |
| | 329,372 |
| | (6,167,767 | ) | | — |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 21,600 |
| | 129,600 |
| | 436,078 |
| | — |
| | 3,661,911 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | — |
| | 86,250 |
| | 257,625 |
| | — |
| | 1,849,991 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | — |
| | 66,000 |
| | 111,783 |
| | — |
| | 882,615 |
|
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 162,500 |
| | 65,000 |
| | 123,927 |
| | — |
| | 811,445 |
|
| |
(1) | The amounts reflect the credited contributions we made to the accounts of the Named Executive Officers in 2017. All of the contributions shown are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above. |
| |
(2) | The amounts reflect hypothetical accrued gains (or losses) in 2017 on the aggregate of contributions by the Named Executive Officers and us on notional investments designed to track the performance of the funds selected by the Named Executive Officers, as reflected below. No amounts of such aggregate earnings are reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” above. |
(2)The amounts reflect hypothetical accrued gains (or losses) in 2020 on the aggregate of contributions by the Named Executive Officers and us on notional investments designed to track the performance of the funds selected by the Named Executive Officers, as reflected below. No amounts of such aggregate earnings are reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” above. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Aggregate Earnings (Losses) for the Year |
| Name | | Executive
Contributions ($) | | Company
Contributions ($) | | Total ($) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 45,991 |
| | 129,050 |
| | 175,041 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | 4,234 |
| | 325,138 |
| | 329,372 |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 233,139 |
| | 202,939 |
| | 436,078 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | 148,990 |
| | 108,635 |
| | 257,625 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | 26,674 |
| | 85,109 |
| | 111,783 |
|
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 96,153 |
| | 27,774 |
| | 123,927 |
|
| |
(3) | The amounts reflect the accumulated account values (including gains and losses) of contributions by the Named Executive Officers and us as of December 31, 2017 as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Earnings (Losses) for the Year |
| Name | | Executive
Contributions ($) | | Company
Contributions ($) | | Total ($) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 206,740 | | | 654,827 | | | 861,567 | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | — | | | 48,669 | | | 48,669 | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | (100,043) | | | (94,799) | | | (194,842) | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 27,955 | | | 123,976 | | | 151,931 | |
| Eric A. Silva | | — | | | 84,775 | | | 84,775 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Aggregate Balance |
| Name | | Executive
Contributions ($) | | Company
Contributions ($) | | Total ($) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 443,102 |
| | 1,360,515 |
| | 1,803,617 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Clyde W. Hewlett | | 1,945,226 |
| | 1,716,685 |
| | 3,661,911 |
|
| Alan R. Curtis | | 1,039,451 |
| | 810,540 |
| | 1,849,991 |
|
| David K. Lawrence | | 201,378 |
| | 681,237 |
| | 882,615 |
|
| Stephen P. Barrett | | 620,230 |
| | 191,215 |
| | 811,445 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Balance |
| Name | | Executive
Contributions ($) | | Company
Contributions ($) | | Total ($) |
| Roderick A. Larson | | 1,030,780 | | | 3,338,183 | | | 4,368,963 | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. | | — | | | 337,350 | | | 337,350 | |
| Alan R. Curtis | | 1,157,721 | | | 1,200,369 | | | 2,358,090 | |
| David K. Lawrence | | 252,245 | | | 1,108,120 | | | 1,360,365 | |
| Eric A. Silva | | — | | | 595,145 | | | 595,145 | |
Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control
As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, we have entered into Change-of-Control Agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers. In addition, we entered into the Retention Agreement with Mr. Davison when he joined Oceaneering in 2019. Upon a change of control of Oceaneering, the Named Executive Officers may be subject to certain excise taxes pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code. The Change-of-Control Agreements do not provide for reimbursement of such excise taxes. The Change-of-Control Agreements provide for reduction of the Named Executive Officer’s calculated severance package to the safe-harbor amount (as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Post-Employment Compensation Programs — Change-of-Control Agreements” above), if doing so would provide a greater benefit on an after-tax basis. Whether an excise tax liability arises will depend on the facts and circumstances in existence at the time a change-of-control payment becomes payable. The tables below do not reflect any such reduction for any of the Named Executive Officers. All of the outstanding long-term incentive agreements of the Named Executive Officers have provisions for settlement in the event of death, disability or a change of control. The Retention Agreement has provisions for payments in the event of death, disability, termination by Oceaneering without cause (as defined) and termination by Mr. Davison with good reason (as defined); however, the Severance Payment provided for under the Retention Agreement shall not be payable if, during the period specified, Mr. Davison becomes eligible for a severance payment under the Change-of-Control Agreement entered into with him.
For purposes of the Change-of-Control Agreements, the terms “cause,” “change of control,” “disability,” “good reason” and “highest base salary” have the meanings set forth below:
•“cause” for termination by us means:
◦for a participant in the CoC Plan, our determination that the participant:
▪has committed a material breach of any of his or her obligations under any written agreement with us;
▪has committed a material violation of any of our policies, procedures, rules and regulations applicable to employees generally or to employees at his or her grade level, in each case, as they may be amended from time to time;
▪has failed to perform, in any material respect, his or her duties or responsibilities to our company (other than as a result of physical or mental illness or injury);
▪has committed fraud, theft, embezzlement or misappropriation of any of our funds or other assets; or
▪has been convicted of, entered a plea of guilty or no-contest to, or received adjudicated probation or deferred adjudication in connection with, a crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or any felony (or crime of similar import outside the United States); and
◦for purposes of the Legacy CoC Agreements, conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction, from which conviction no further appeal can be taken, of a felony-grade crime involving moral turpitude related to employment with us;
•“change of control” is defined in the CoC Plan and the Legacy CoC Agreements as occurring if:
◦any person is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of our securities representing 20% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding voting securities, other than through the purchase of voting securities directly from a private placement by us;
◦the current members of our Board, or subsequent members approved by at least two-thirds of the current members, no longer comprise a majority of our Board;
◦our company is merged or consolidated with another corporation or entity, and our shareholders own less than 60% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting corporation or entity;
◦there has been a consummation of either a tender offer or exchange offer by a person other than us for the ownership of 20% or more of our voting securities; or
◦there has been a disposition of all or substantially all of our assets (other than in specified types of affiliate transactions).
•“disability” is defined in the CoC Plan and the Legacy CoC Agreements as the continuing full-time absence of the officer (or other CoC Plan participant, as applicable) from his or her duties for 90 days or longer as a result of physical or mental incapacity and such absence is anticipated to extend for 90 additional days or longer (the need for such absence and its anticipated duration to be determined solely by the individual’s physician who is approved by us, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld); and
•“good reason” for termination by the officer includes:
◦for a participant in the CoC Plan:
▪a material reduction in the authority, duties or responsibilities of such participant from those applicable to him or her immediately prior to the change of control, except as a result of his or her death or due to disability;
▪a material reduction by us in such participant’s annual base salary, SERP contribution level by us, annual bonus opportunity or aggregate long-term incentive compensation in effect immediately prior to the change of control and as may subsequently be increased thereafter;
▪our failure to continue in effect any benefit plans in which such participant was participating immediately prior to the change of control, other than as a result of the expiration or an amendment of any such benefit plan in accordance with its terms, or our taking (or failing to take) any action that would materially reduce such participant’s benefits under any of the benefit plans in which such participant was participating or deprive such participant of any material benefit, including a severance plan benefit, enjoyed by such participant, immediately prior to the change of control (except as may be proposed by such participant to us);
▪the relocation of the principal place of such participant’s employment as of the change of control to a location at least 50 miles further from his or her principal residence without such participant’s express written consent, unless such relocation is agreed to in writing by the participant (or was scheduled and communicated in writing by us to the officer prior to the change of control); or
▪our failure, upon a change of control, to obtain the assumption of the CoC Plan by any successor (other than by operation of law); and
◦for purposes of the Legacy CoC Agreements:
▪an adverse change in status, title or position;
▪a reduction in annual base salary, SERP contribution level by us, annual bonus opportunity or aggregate long-term compensation, all as may be increased subsequent to date of the Change-of-Control Agreement;
▪our failure to continue certain bonus plans and the SERP in effect, other than as a result of the normal expiration or amendment of any such plan in accordance with its terms, or our taking (or failing to take) any action that would (1) adversely affect the officer’s continued participation in any such plan on at least as favorable a basis to the officer as is the case immediately prior to the effective date of the change of control or (2) materially reduce the officer’s benefits under any of such plans or deprive the officer of any material benefit enjoyed by him or her immediately prior to a change of control (except as may be proposed by the officer to us);
▪a relocation of the principal place of the officer’s employment to a location 25 miles further from the officer’s principal residence without his or her express written consent;
▪the failure of a successor to assume the Change-of-Control Agreement;
▪any prohibition by us against the individual engaging in outside activities permitted by the Change-of-Control Agreement; and
▪any default by us in the performance of our obligations under the Change-of-Control Agreement, whether before or after a change of control; and
•“highest base salary” means the officer’s highest annual rate of base salary during a specified period preceding the date of termination, which is:
◦for purposes of the Legacy CoC Agreements, the then current year or any of the three years preceding the date of termination; and
◦for purposes of the CoC Plan, 180 days prior to and two years after the change of control.
Assuming a December 31, 20172020 termination date and, where applicable, using the closing price of our Common Stock of $21.14$7.95 per share on December 29, 201731, 2020 (the last trading day on the NYSE in 2017)2020), the tables below show potential payments to each of the Named Executive Officers under the existing contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, in the event of a termination of such executive’s employment, including amounts payable pursuant to benefits or awards in which the Named Executive Officers are already vested. As used
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Roderick A. Larson |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | Involuntary
Termination | | Death and
Disability | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — | | | $ | 323,000 | | (1) | $ | — | | | $ | 6,270,000 | | (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — | | | 1,874 | | (1) | — | | | 269,568 | | (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 2,014,697 | | (4) | 2,014,697 | | (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 6,437,400 | | (6) | 12,005,400 | | (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 93,589 | | | 93,589 | | | 93,589 | | | 93,589 | | |
| SERP (vested) | | 3,706,394 | | (8) | 3,706,394 | | (8) | 3,706,394 | | (8) | 3,706,394 | | (8) |
| SERP (unvested) | | — | | (8) | — | | (8) | 662,569 | | (8) | 662,569 | | (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 3,799,983 | | | $ | 4,124,857 | | | $ | 12,914,649 | | | $ | 25,022,217 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Charles W. Davison, Jr. |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | Involuntary
Termination | | Death and
Disability | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,480,000 | | (1) | $ | — | | (1) | $ | 2,480,000 | | (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — | | | 1,867 | | (1) | — | | | 22,404 | | (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | 504,070 | | (9) | 1,092,410 | | (4) | 1,092,410 | | (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 1,860,000 | | (6) | 1,860,000 | | (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 64,417 | | | 64,417 | | | 64,417 | | | 64,417 | | |
| SERP (vested) | | 81,926 | | (8) | 81,926 | | (8) | 81,926 | | (8) | 81,926 | | (8) |
| SERP (unvested) | | — | | (8) | — | | (8) | 255,424 | | (8) | 255,424 | | (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 146,343 | | | $ | 3,132,280 | | | $ | 3,354,177 | | | $ | 5,856,581 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alan R. Curtis |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | Involuntary
Termination | | Death and
Disability | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — | | | $ | 369,519 | | (1) | $ | — | | | $ | 1,494,500 | | (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — | | | 1,874 | | (1) | — | | | 142,440 | | (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 613,756 | | (4) | 613,756 | | (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 1,913,079 | | (6) | 3,602,000 | | (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 59,123 | | | 59,123 | | | 59,123 | | | 59,123 | | |
| SERP (vested) | | 2,358,090 | | (8) | 2,358,090 | | (8) | 2,358,090 | | (8) | 2,358,090 | | (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 2,417,213 | | | $ | 2,788,606 | | | $ | 4,944,048 | | | $ | 8,269,909 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David K. Lawrence |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | Involuntary
Termination | | Death and
Disability | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — | | | $ | 194,712 | | (1) | $ | — | | | $ | 1,312,500 | | (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — | | | 1,857 | | (1) | — | | | 155,928 | | (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 165,837 | | (4) | 165,837 | | (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 438,300 | | (6) | 876,600 | | (7) |
| Restricted Stock Units (vested) | | 256,857 | | (10) | 256,857 | | (10) | 256,857 | | (10) | 256,857 | | (10) |
| Performance Units (vested) | | 485,850 | | (11) | 485,850 | | (11) | 912,350 | | (6) | 1,643,000 | | (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 51,923 | | | 51,923 | | | 51,923 | | | 51,923 | | |
| SERP (vested) | | 1,360,365 | | (8) | 1,360,365 | | (8) | 1,360,365 | | (8) | 1,360,365 | | (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 2,154,995 | | | $ | 2,351,564 | | | $ | 3,185,632 | | | $ | 5,823,010 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Eric A. Silva |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | Involuntary
Termination | | Death and
Disability | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — | | | $ | 168,300 | | (1) | $ | — | | | $ | 1,309,000 | | (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — | | | 1,857 | | (1) | — | | | 156,528 | | (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 313,461 | | (4) | 313,461 | | (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — | | | — | | | 991,437 | | (6) | 1,857,800 | | (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 47,901 | | | 47,901 | | | 47,901 | | | 47,901 | | |
| SERP (vested) | | 595,145 | | (8) | 595,145 | | (8) | 595,145 | | (8) | 595,145 | | (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 643,046 | | | $ | 813,203 | | | $ | 1,947,944 | | | $ | 4,279,835 | | |
(1)Payment of benefit is provided only if involuntary termination is the result of a reduction in force, except with respect to Mr. Davison while the Retention Agreement is in effect (see “Retention and Severance Payments Agreement” under the heading “— Executive Compensation Components — Post-Employment Compensation Programs” in the agreements referenced“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above). For Mr. Davison, payment of benefit is provided pursuant to the Retention Agreement in the tables below,event of termination by Oceaneering without cause, by Mr. Davison for good reason, or in the term “Changeevent of Control” hasdeath or disability, and is equal to the same meaning asSeverance Payment. For the other Named Executive Officers, the amounts reflect the salary reductions effective from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.
(2)The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects an amount equaling three times, for Mr. Larson, or two times, for other executives, the sum of: (a) the highest annual rate of base salary for the then-current year or any of the three years preceding the date of termination or, for Mr. Davison, the highest annual rate of base salary during the period beginning 180 days prior to and ending two years after the change of control (each, a “Base Rate”); (b) the target award he is eligible to receive under the Annual Cash Bonus Program for the then-current year; and (c) for Mr. Larson, the maximum percentage of base salary contribution level by us for him in our SERP for the then-current year multiplied by his Base Rate, payable pursuant to his Change-of-Control Agreements define that term. For a summary of that definition, seeAgreement. If applicable, the termination amount may be reduced to the “safe harbor amount” (see for more information, “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Post-Employment Compensation Programs — Change-of-Control Agreements” above.above) if more beneficial to the Named Executive Officer on an after-tax basis.
(3)The amount for each Named Executive Officer, other than Mr. Davison, reflects the estimated value of the benefit to him to receive the same level of medical, life insurance and disability benefits for a period of 36 months, for Mr. Larson, or 24 months, for other executives, after termination that would be payable pursuant to the executive’s Legacy CoC Agreement. The amount for Mr. Davison reflects the estimated value of the
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Roderick A. Larson |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | | Involuntary
Termination | | | Death and
Disability | | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 40,385 |
| (1) | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 5,590,068 |
| (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — |
| | | 1,734 |
| (1) | | — |
| | | 226,591 |
| (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 1,733,057 |
| (4) | | 1,733,057 |
| (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 1,890,000 |
| (6) | | 6,510,000 |
| (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 97,078 |
| | | 97,078 |
| | | 97,078 |
| | | 97,078 |
| |
| SERP (vested) | | 1,351,429 |
| (8) | | 1,351,429 |
| (8) | | 1,351,429 |
| (8) | | 1,351,429 |
| (8) |
| SERP (unvested) | | 452,188 |
| (8) | | 452,188 |
| (8) | | 452,188 |
| (8) | | 452,188 |
| (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 1,900,695 |
| | | $ | 1,942,814 |
| | | $ | 5,523,752 |
| | | $ | 15,960,411 |
| |
(4)The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects the value of shares of Common Stock that would be delivered for each outstanding unvested restricted stock unit pursuant to the executive’s 2018, 2019 and 2020 Restricted Stock Unit Agreements. Mr. Lawrence, by reason of having attained Retirement Age (as defined), was fully vested under his 2018 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, two-thirds vested under his 2019 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and one-third vested under his 2020 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clyde W. Hewlett |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | | Involuntary
Termination | | | Death and
Disability | | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 49,846 |
| (1) | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 1,728,000 |
| (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — |
| | | 1,734 |
| (1) | | — |
| | | 173,520 |
| (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 354,433 |
| (4) | | 354,433 |
| (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 449,300 |
| (6) | | 1,237,300 |
| (7) |
| Restricted Stock Units (vested) | | 542,854 |
| (9) | | 542,854 |
| (9) | | 542,854 |
| (9) | | 542,854 |
| (9) |
| Performance Units (vested) | | — |
| (10) | | — |
| (10) | | 224,600 |
| (6) | | 2,143,000 |
| (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 65,909 |
| | | 65,909 |
| | | 65,909 |
| | | 65,909 |
| |
| SERP (vested) | | 3,661,911 |
| (8) | | 3,661,911 |
| (8) | | 3,661,911 |
| (8) | | 3,661,911 |
| (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 4,270,674 |
| | | $ | 4,322,254 |
| | | $ | 5,299,007 |
| | | $ | 9,906,927 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alan R. Curtis |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | | Involuntary
Termination | | | Death and
Disability | | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 39,808 |
| (1) | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 1,207,500 |
| (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — |
| | | 1,734 |
| (1) | | — |
| | | 114,049 |
| (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 559,851 |
| (4) | | 559,851 |
| (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 414,000 |
| (6) | | 1,428,000 |
| (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 53,077 |
| | | 53,077 |
| | | 53,077 |
| | | 53,077 |
| |
| SERP (vested) | | 1,849,991 |
| (8) | | 1,849,991 |
| (8) | | 1,849,991 |
| (8) | | 1,849,991 |
| (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 1,903,068 |
| | | $ | 1,944,610 |
| | | $ | 2,876,919 |
| | | $ | 5,212,468 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David K. Lawrence |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | | Involuntary
Termination | | | Death and
Disability | | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 25,385 |
| (1) | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 1,122,000 |
| (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — |
| | | 1,717 |
| (1) | | — |
| | | 128,879 |
| (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 428,867 |
| (4) | | 428,867 |
| (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 356,400 |
| (6) | | 1,597,800 |
| (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 50,769 |
| | | 50,769 |
| | | 50,769 |
| | | 50,769 |
| |
| SERP (vested) | | 882,615 |
| (8) | | 882,615 |
| (8) | | 882,615 |
| (8) | | 882,615 |
| (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 933,384 |
| | | $ | 960,486 |
| | | $ | 1,718,651 |
| | | $ | 4,210,930 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stephen P. Barrett |
Payments upon
Termination | | Voluntary
Termination | | | Involuntary
Termination | | | Death and
Disability | | | Change of Control
With Termination | |
| Severance Payments | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 12,500 |
| (1) | | $ | — |
| | | $ | 1,105,000 |
| (2) |
| Benefit Plan Participation | | — |
| | | 1,756 |
| (1) | | — |
| | | 103,520 |
| (3) |
| Restricted Stock Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 565,918 |
| (4) | | 565,918 |
| (5) |
| Performance Units (unvested & accelerated) | | — |
| | | — |
| | | 390,000 |
| (6) | | 1,980,000 |
| (7) |
| Accrued Vacation/Base Salary | | 31,491 |
| | | 31,491 |
| | | 31,491 |
| | | 31,491 |
| |
| SERP (vested) | | 672,250 |
| (8) | | 672,250 |
| (8) | | 672,250 |
| (8) | | 672,250 |
| (8) |
| SERP (unvested) | | 139,195 |
| (8) | | 139,195 |
| (8) | | 139,195 |
| (8) | | 139,195 |
| (8) |
| TOTAL | | $ | 842,936 |
| | | $ | 857,192 |
| | | $ | 1,798,854 |
| | | $ | 4,597,374 |
| |
| |
(1) | Payment of benefit only if involuntary termination is the result of a reduction in force. |
| |
(2) | The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects an amount equaling three times, for Mr. Larson, or two times, for other executives, the sum of: (a) the highest annual rate of base salary for the current year or any of the prior three years (“Base Rate”); (b) the target award he is eligible to receive under the annual cash bonus program for the current year; and (c), for Mr. Larson, the maximum percentage of base salary contribution level by us for him in our SERP for the current year multiplied by his Base Rate, payable pursuant to his Change-of-Control Agreement. If applicable, the termination amount will be reduced to the “safe harbor amount” (see for more information, “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Post-Employment Compensation Programs — Change-of-Control Agreements” above) if more beneficial to the Named Executive Officer on an after-tax basis. |
| |
(3) | The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects the estimated value of the benefit to him to receive the same level of medical, life insurance and disability benefits for a period of three years, for Mr. Larson, or two years, for other executives, after termination that is payable pursuant to the executive’s Change-of-Control Agreement. |
| |
(4) | The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects the value of shares of Common Stock that would be delivered for each outstanding unvested restricted stock unit pursuant to the executive’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Agreements. Mr. Hewlett, by reason of having attained Retirement Age (as defined), was fully vested under his 2015 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, two-thirds vested under his 2016 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and one-third vested under his 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. |
| |
(5) | The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects the value of shares of Common Stock that would be delivered for each outstanding unvested restricted stock unit pursuant to the executive’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Agreements and Change-of-Control Agreement. See footnote (4) above regarding vesting under Mr. Hewlett’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Agreements. |
| |
(6) | (6)Upon death or disability, the performance units awarded pursuant to the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Performance Unit Agreements would vest and the final values of the units would be determined as follows: (i) for each of the 2015 and 2016 performance units awarded, the final value would be equal to the value determined by the Compensation Committee |
based on Oceaneering’s attainment with respect to the performance measures established at the time of award; and (ii) for the 2017 performance units awarded pursuant to the 2018, 2019 and 2020 Performance Unit Agreements would vest (if not otherwise vested by reason of the participant’s having attained Retirement Age (as defined)) and the final value would be equal to the target value of $100 per unit. No cash payments were made pursuant toFor more information about the goals and measures and the amounts payable, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above.
(7)The performance units awarded in 2015, aspursuant to the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold level of performance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 was2018, 2019 and 2020 Performance Unit Agreements would vest (if not attained for either average return on invested capital or cumulative cash flow. Otherwise, an amount would have been included for the executive in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columnotherwise vested by reason of the “Summary Compensation Table” above. participant’s having attained Retirement Age (as defined)) and the final values of the units would be determined as follows: (a) for each of Messrs. Larson, Curtis, Lawrence and Silva, the final value would be equal to the maximum value of $200 per unit pursuant to his Legacy CoC Agreement; and (b) for Mr. Davison, the final value would be equal to the target value of $100 per unit pursuant to his Change-of-Control Agreement under the CoC Plan. See footnote (11) below regarding vesting under Mr. Lawrence’s 2018, 2019 and 2020 Performance Unit Agreements.
(8)The amount payable, if any, for each Named Executive Officer reflects the accumulated account values (including gains and losses) of contributions by the Named Executive Officer and Oceaneering for vested amounts and by Oceaneering for unvested amounts. Messrs. Curtis, Lawrence and Silva were fully vested in their respective SERP accounts. For more information on SERP amounts, see “— Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” above.
(9)The amount for Mr. Davison reflects the value of shares of Common Stock that would be delivered for each outstanding unvested restricted stock unit pursuant to his Sign-on Award (see “— Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” above).
(10)The amount for Mr. Lawrence reflects the executive’s 2016 Performancevalue of shares of Common Stock that would be delivered for each outstanding vested restricted stock unit pursuant to his 2018, 2019 and 2020 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement will not be known until the completion of the three-year performance period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, at which time the performance will be measured. Agreements and (as applicable) Legacy CoC Agreement.
(11)Mr. Hewlett,Lawrence, by reason of having attained Retirement Age (as defined), was fully vested under his 20152018 Performance Unit Agreement, two-thirds vested under his 20162019 Performance Unit Agreement and one-third vested under his 20172020 Performance Unit Agreement. The amount for Mr. Lawrence reflects an amount in cash for vested performance units awarded pursuant to his 2018 Performance Unit Agreement, based on performance for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020, with Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA for the three-year period between the target and maximum levels and Relative TSR above target, but capped at target (due to absolute TSR being negative), resulting in a final value at between target and maximum levels (after giving effect to a change in metric from Cumulative EBITDA to Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA approved by the Compensation Committee). The amounts payable, if any, for Mr. Lawrence pursuant to his 2019 and 2020 Performance Unit Agreements for outstanding vested performance units will not be known until completion of the three-year performance periods of January 1, 2019 – December 31, 2021 and January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2022, respectively, at which time the performance will be measured. For information about the goals and measures and the amounts payable, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Incentive Compensation”Compensation — 2020-2022 Performance Units” above.
| |
(7) | The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects cash payment for outstanding vested and unvested performance units at the maximum goal level pursuant to the executive’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Performance Unit Agreements ($150, $150 and $200 per unit, respectively) and Change-of-Control Agreement. See footnote (6) above regarding vesting under Mr. Hewlett’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Performance Unit Agreements. |
| |
(8) | The amount for each Named Executive Officer reflects the accumulated account values (including gain and losses) of contributions by the Named Executive Officer and Oceaneering for vested amounts and by Oceaneering for unvested amounts. Messrs. Hewlett, Curtis and Lawrence were fully vested in their respective SERP accounts. For more information on SERP amounts, see “Nonqualified Deferred Contributions” above. |
| |
(9) | The amount for Mr. Hewlett reflects the value of shares of Common Stock that would be delivered for each outstanding vested restricted stock unit pursuant to his 2015, 2016 and 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Agreements and Change-of-Control Agreement. See footnote (4) above regarding vesting under Mr. Hewlett’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Agreements. |
| |
(10) | The amount for Mr. Hewlett reflects no cash payment for vested performance units awarded in 2015, as the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold level of performance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 was not attained for either average return on invested capital or cumulative cash flow. Otherwise, an amount would have been included for Mr. Hewlett in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above. The amounts payable, if any, for Mr. Hewlett pursuant to his 2016 and 2017 Performance Unit Agreements for outstanding vested performance units will not be known until completion of the three-year performance periods of January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2018 and January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2019, respectively, at which time the performance will be measured. See footnote (6) above regarding vesting under Mr. Hewlett’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Performance Unit Agreements. For information about the goals and measures and the amounts payable, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above. |
Chief Executive Officer and Median Employee Compensation (CEO
CEO Pay Ratio)Ratio
The table below sets forth comparative information regarding: (1) the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer for the year ended December 31, 2017, determined on the basis described below;2020; (2) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of Oceaneering (including its consolidated subsidiaries), excluding our Chief Executive Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, determined on the basis described below; and (3) a ratio comparison of those two amounts (the “CEO Pay Ratio”). These amounts were determined in accordance with rules prescribed by the SEC. For 20172020 the CEO Pay Ratio was 33:60:1, as explained below.
Our Chief Executive Officer is Roderick A. Larson. Mr. Larson was appointed Chief Executive Officer effective as of May 5, 2017. In accordance with guidance provided by the SEC, we determined Mr. Larson’s annual total compensation for purposes of the table below by annualizing elements of his compensation that changed as a result of his promotion to Chief Executive Officer. As a result, the amount we determined is greater than the amount for 2017 set forth in the “Total” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” included in this Proxy Statement, as the amounts reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” reflect amounts actually earned, without annualization.
For purposes of determining the median of the annual total compensation of all Oceaneering employees, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the applicable SEC rules require us to identify the median employee, by using either annual total compensation for all such employees or another consistently applied compensation measure. For these purposes, we used total cash compensation, as determined from payroll records for the period from October 31, 2019 through November 1, 2016 through October 31, 20172020 (the “Measurement Date”), as our consistently applied compensation measure.
We did not take into account equity-based incentive compensation awards, because less than 5% of our employees receive those awards. Except as noted below, we included all Oceaneering employees as of the Measurement Date, whether employed on a full-time, part-time or seasonal basis. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, and we did not annualize the compensation for any full-time employees that were not employed by us for the entire measurement period. In accordance with SEC rules, we availed ourselves of a de minimis exemption to exclude a number of non-U.S. employees thatwho collectively represented fewer than 5% of the approximately 9,2558,790 total employees as of the Measurement Date (such total being the total number of U.S. and non-U.S. employees irrespective of the de minimis exemption and the total number used for the de minimis calculation). Under this exemption, we excluded all employees from the following jurisdictions: Azerbaijan (134(153 employees); Equatorial Guinea (2Canada (60 employees); China (1 employee); Germany (2 employees); Ghana (11 employees); Indonesia (74(Indonesia (65 employees); Malaysia (43(32 employees); Mexico (77 employees); Nicaragua (5(7 employees); Nigeria (26(16 employees); Oman (19(13 employees); Singapore (36 employees)Papua New Guinea (1 employee); South Africa (3 employees); Tanzania (2 employees) and Thailand (18(14 employees).
After identifying the median employee, based on the process described above, we calculated annual total compensation for that employee using the same methodology we used for determining total compensation for 20172020 for the Named Executive Officers as set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
|
| | | | | | | |
Annual Total Compensation*Compensation | | Amount |
| Chief Executive Officer (A) | | $2,621,2915,251,749 |
| Median of all employees (excluding our Chief Executive Officer) (B) | | $80,09187,376 |
| Ratio of (A) to (B) | | 3360 |
____________
*Annualized, as discussed above.
Our Chief Executive Officer’s targetedtarget total direct compensation, for 2017 was equal to $5,156,280. Theand the ratio of such compensation to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees, for 2017 (excluding our Chief Executive Officer), shown above, is 64:1.2020 approximate the amounts reported above. For this purpose, our Chief Executive Officer’s targetedtarget total direct compensation for 2017 is2020 was equal to $5,320,000, calculated as the sum of: (i)of Mr. Larson’s initial base salary for 2020 and 2017the target values of his (1) corresponding annual cash bonus opportunity, at target, annualized based on the date of his promotion to Chief Executive Officer; (ii) the grant-date fair value of his 2017(2) restricted stock unit awards; (iii) the target value of his 2017award and (3) performance unit awards; and (iv) all otheraward. The compensation Mr. Larson earned in 2017.of the median employee identified for 2020 did not include incentive compensation.
COMPENSATION OF NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
Our nonemployee directors receive annual cash retainers and awards of restricted stock as compensation for their service. The aggregate of such compensation is targeted at the median of the total direct compensation for nonemployee directors in the Compensation Peer Group, adjusted in the case of the Chairman of our Board for the median of the premium paid to nonexecutivenon-executive chairmen in the Compensation Peer Group, as assessed by the Compensation Consultant and recommended by the Compensation Committee. The Board has indicated its intent to approve cash retainers comprising approximately one-third, and restricted stock awards (in terms of grant-date fair value) comprising approximately two-thirds, of the total direct compensation of our nonemployee directors. However, in recognition of
For 2020, the challenges faced in 2017 as a result of the continuing oil and gas industry downturn, our Board approved annual cash retainers reduced from the medianfor our nonemployee directors, payable in quarterly installments, of the compensation assessed by the Compensation Consultant by $15,000$105,000 for Mr. Huff and by $10,000$70,000 for each of our other nonemployee directors (prorated for Messrs. Hughes and McEvoy, as explained below).
For 2017,directors: provided, however, that on May 1, 2020, the Board approved reductions of 20% in the base cash retainer payments to our nonemployee directors received,for the third and fourth quarters of 2020. For 2020, the Board also approved additional annual cash retainers, payable in quarterly installments, annual cash retainers, as follows: Mr. Huff: $105,000; and each of our other nonemployee directors: $70,000 (prorated for Messrs. Hughes and McEvoy). Additional annual cash retainers of $15,000$30,000 to the Chairmanchair of the Audit Committee and $8,000 $20,000
to each of the Chairmenchairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were also paid in quarterly installments.Committee. During 2017,2020, we did not pay nonemployee directors any additional amount for attendance at meetings of the Board or committees of the Board. The cash retainer for Mr. Hughes, who retired from the Board in May 2017, was prorated based on his retirement date. Mr. McEvoy,Larson, our former Chief Executive Officer, received a prorated cash retainer for his Board service from and after the date of his retirement from his position as Chief Executive Officer. He also receiveddoes not receive separate compensation for his service as Chief Executive Officer until his retirement in May 2017 (seea director. See the “Summary Compensation Table” above for further information concerning such compensation).the compensation paid to Mr. Larson.
During 2017,2020, besides payment of annual retainers, our nonemployee directors were also allowed to participate in health care coverage the same as provided to employees in our basic medical plans. Nonemployee directors could elect to participate in the health care plan without payment of any monthly premium and participate in a supplemental medical plan at no cost to
the director. We paid the Medicare premium for Mr. Hughes. Mr. Huff’s Service Agreement, which is described below, provides for medical coverage on an after-tax basis to Mr. Huff, his spouse and children for their lives. All directors are provided a group personal excess liability insurance policy at no cost to the directors, and they are reimbursed for their travel and other expenses involved in attendance at Board and committee meetings and activities.
In 2017,2020, our nonemployee directors were awarded shares of restricted stock under our Incentive Plan as follows: Mr. Huff: 9,00018,311 shares; and each of Messrs. Berry, Collins, Hughes, McEvoy, Murphy, Reinhardsen and Webster: 6,000our other nonemployee directors: 12,332 shares. In accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreements, the restricted stock awards vested in full on the first anniversary of their respective award dates except for Mr. Hughes, whose award vested upon his retirement from the Board in May 2017.February 27, 2021. The awards were subject to (i)(1) possible earlier vesting on a change of control or the termination of the director’s service due to death, and (ii)(2) such other terms as were set forth in the award agreements with the respective directors. For information about stock ownership guidelines for nonemployee directors, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Stock Ownership Guidelines.”
The table below summarizes the compensation of our nonemployee directors for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Directors Karen H. Beachy and Kavitha Velusamy are omitted, as they were elected to the Board in 2021.
Director Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1) | | Stock
Awards
($)(2) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) | | All Other
Compensation
($)(3)(4) | | Total ($) |
| John R. Huff | | 94,500 | | | 187,322 | | | — | | | 2,147 | | | 283,969 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| William B. Berry | | 78,000 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 19,247 | | 223,403 | |
| T. Jay Collins | | 68,000 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 28,333 | | 222,489 | |
| Deanna L. Goodwin | | 93,000 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 34,429 | | 253,585 | |
| M. Kevin McEvoy | | 63,000 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 28,561 | | 217,717 | |
| Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | 98,000 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 19,247 | | 243,403 | |
| Jon Erik Reinhardsen | | 85,500 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 40,012 | | 251,668 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Steven A. Webster | | 73,000 | | | 126,156 | | | — | | | 13,643 | | 212,799 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(2) | | Stock
Awards
($)(3) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) | | All Other
Compensation
($)(4)(5) | | Total ($) |
| John R. Huff | | 105,000 |
| | 257,130 |
| | — |
| | 81,715 | | 443,845 |
|
| William B. Berry | | 78,000 |
| | 171,420 |
| | — |
| | 16,346 | | 265,766 |
|
| T. Jay Collins | | 70,000 |
| | 171,420 |
| | — |
| | 25,106 | | 266,526 |
|
| D. Michael Hughes | | 39,000 |
| | 171,420 |
| | — |
| | 18,338 | | 228,758 |
|
| M. Kevin McEvoy (1) | | 35,000 |
| | 156,180 |
| | — |
| | 162,672 | | 353,852 |
|
| Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | 85,000 |
| | 171,420 |
| | — |
| | 16,346 | | 272,766 |
|
| Jon Erik Reinhardsen | | 70,000 |
| | 171,420 |
| | — |
| | 1,694 | | 243,114 |
|
| Steven A. Webster | | 76,000 |
| | 171,420 |
| | — |
| | 11,546 | | 258,966 |
|
| |
(1) | On May 5, 2017, Mr. McEvoy retired as our Chief Executive Officer and ceased to be an employee. At that time, he received an award of restricted stock vesting in the ordinary course on the anniversary of the grant date, as described above. See “Compensation of Executive Officers” above for details of 2017 compensation awarded to Mr. McEvoy in his capacity as an executive officer. |
| |
(2) | The amounts shown are attributable entirely to annual retainers as described above. |
| |
(3) | The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of awards by us in 2017 related to restricted stock awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. The aggregate numbers of restricted shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017 were: 6,000 for each of Messrs. Berry, Collins, Murphy, McEvoy, Reinhardsen and Webster; 9,000 for Mr. Huff; and none for Mr. Hughes, as the restricted stock award to him for 2017 vested upon his retirement prior to such date. |
| |
(4) | (2)The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of awards by us in 2020 related to restricted stock awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. The aggregate numbers of restricted shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020 were 18,311 for Mr. Huff, and 12,332 for each of our other nonemployee directors. (3)The amount shown for each attributable perquisite or other personal benefit does not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received by any director, except as quantified in footnote (5) below. |
| |
(5) | The amounts shown for 2017 are attributable to the provision of excess liability insurance and the following: |
Mr. Huff: (i) $29,240 for tax gross-up payments associated with his medical coverage described below; and (ii) perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: $52,475received by any director.
(4)The amounts shown for annual premiums2020 are attributable to the provision of excess liability insurance and, reimbursement of medical costs for health care, including premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan;
Messrs. Berry, Murphy and Webster: perquisites andall directors other personal benefits comprised of:than Mr. Huff, premiums for a supplemental medical insurance plan;
Mr. Collins:plan. In addition, for Ms. Goodwin and Messrs. Collins, McEvoy and Reinhardsen, perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of:include an annual premium for basic health care provided by us; premiumus. See the discussion below under the caption “Service Agreement with Mr. Huff” for a supplemental medical insurance plan; and personal useinformation about various post-employment benefits provided to Mr. Huff.
Mr. Hughes: perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of: annual premium for basic health care provided by us; Medicare premium paid by us; and premium for a supplemental medical insurance plan.
Service Agreement with Mr. Huff
In 2001, we entered into a Service Agreementservice agreement with Mr. Huff, when Mr. Huff was serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, replacing Mr. Huff’s prior employment agreement. That agreement was amended in 2006 and 2008 (as amended, the “Service Agreement”) to address, among other things, issues arising under Section 409A of the Code. The Service Agreement provides, among other things, for: (i)(1) medical coverage on an after-tax basis to Mr. Huff, his spouse and two adult children for their lives, including any additional payment necessary to make him whole for any excise tax liability if payment thereof is a “parachute payment” (as defined in the Code); and (ii)(2) entitlement to post-retirement benefits, including a payment of $800,000 per year for 10 years, which became fully vested and commenced on August 15,in 2011 provided that(and the final such payment was made in the event of Mr. Huff’s death, his disability or a change of control, all unpaid amounts would be accelerated and become payable in a non-discounted lump-sum payment.2020). The Service Agreement also provides tax protection, generally to ensure that Mr. Huff will not be impacted adversely by taxes under Section 409A of the Code.
Also as part of Mr. Huff’s retirement benefits, we established an irrevocable grantor trust, commonly known as a “rabbi trust,” to provide Mr. Huff greater assurance of an adequate source of funds for the payment of post-retirement benefits under the Service Agreement. In connection with the establishment of the trust, we contributed to the trust a life insurance policy previously obtained on the life of Mr. Huff, and agreed to continue to pay the premiums due on that policy. When the life insurance policy matures, the proceeds of the policy will become assets of the trust. If the value of trust assets exceeds $4 million, as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index, at any time after January 1, 2012, the excess may be paid to us. In 2019, we elected to withdraw a portion of such excess. However, because the trust is irrevocable, the assets of the trust are generally not otherwise available to fund our future operations until the trust terminates, which is not expected to occur during the lives of Mr. Huff, his spouse or his children. Furthermore, no tax deduction will be available for our contributions to the trust; however, we may benefit from future tax deductions for benefits actually paid from the trust (although benefit payments from the trust are not expected to occur in the near term, because we expect to make direct payments of those benefits for the foreseeable future).
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Our Board of Directors adopted a written policy with respect to related-person transactions to document procedures pursuant to which such transactions are reviewed and approved or ratified. The policy applies to any transaction in which (i)(1) Oceaneering or any of its subsidiaries is a participant; (ii)(2) any related person has a direct or indirect material interest; and (iii)(3) the amount involved exceeds $120,000, but excludes generally any transaction that does not require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC and specifically certain categories of routine transactions, such as standard director compensation arrangements approved by the Board or a committee thereof, transactions in which all shareholders receive proportional benefits, and transactions available to our employees generally. Under the policy, related persons include our directors, nominees to become a director, executive officers, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our voting securities, immediate family members of any of the foregoing persons, and any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed as an executive officer or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership. Our policy includes a process to monitor and submit related-person transactions to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available and evaluate whether to approve or ratify the transaction.
Except as set forth in this Proxy Statement, no director or executive officer of Oceaneering or nominee for election as a director of Oceaneering, or holder of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, and no member of the immediate family of any such director, nominee, officer or security holder, to our knowledge, had any material interest in any transaction during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, or in any currently proposed transaction, to which Oceaneering or any subsidiary of Oceaneering was or is a party in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000. Mr. Stephen Lazar, Jr., who is a brother-in-law of our Former Chief Executive Officer,Mr. McEvoy, serves as GlobalDirector, Operational Excellence in our Operations Support Manager, Service and Rental in our Subsea Products segment,group, for which he received total compensation for 20172020 of approximately $166,000,$206,000, which is commensurate with that of his peers.
No director or executive officer of Oceaneering who has served in such capacity since January 1, 20172020 or any associate of any such director or officer, to the knowledge of the executive officers of Oceaneering, has any material interest in any matter proposed to be acted on at the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, other than as described in this Proxy Statement.
PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP, independent certified public accountants, as independent auditors of Oceaneering for the year ending December 31, 2018.2021. Although we are not required to seek shareholder approval of the appointment, it has been our practice to do so. No determination has been made as to what action the Audit Committee would take if our shareholders fail to ratify the appointment. The Audit Committee retains the discretion to appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee concludes such a change would be in the best interests of Oceaneering. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions of any shareholders.
In accordance with our Bylaws, the approval of the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of Oceaneering for the year ending December 31, 20182021 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock voted on this proposal at the meeting. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes marked on proxy cards will not be included in the tabulation of votes cast on this proposal.
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR this proposal. The persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote such proxy in favor of the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of Oceaneering for the year ending December 31, 2018,2021, unless a contrary choice is set forth thereon or unless an abstention or broker non-vote is indicated thereon.
Independent Auditors’ Fees
The following table shows the fees incurred by Oceaneering for the audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for 20172020 and 2016.2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fees Incurred for Audit and Other Services Provided by Ernst & Young LLP | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 2,627,000 | | | $ | 2,796,300 | |
| Audit-Related Fees (2) | | 5,000 | | | 81,358 | |
| Tax Fees (3) | | 38,800 | | | 94,200 | |
| All Other Fees (4) | | — | | | — | |
| Total | | $ | 2,670,800 | | | $ | 2,971,858 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fees Incurred for Audit and Other Services Provided by Ernst & Young LLP | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Audit Fees (1) | | 2,476,000 |
| | $ | 2,585,000 |
|
| Audit-Related Fees (2) | | 175,000 |
| | 29,000 |
|
| Tax Fees (3) | | 34,000 |
| | 65,000 |
|
| All Other Fees (4) | | 2,000 |
| | 2,000 |
|
| Total | | 2,687,000 |
| | $ | 2,681,000 |
|
| |
(1) | Audit Fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with: (a) the audit of our financial statements for the years indicated and the reviews of our financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q during those years; and (b) audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings. |
| |
(2) | Audit-Related Fees consisted of fees for accounting, consultation services, employee benefit plan audits, services related to due diligence for business transactions, and statutory and regulatory compliance. |
| |
(3) | Tax Fees consisted of tax compliance and consultation fees. |
| |
(4) | All Other Fees consisted of a subscription to Ernst & Young LLP’s informational on-line service. |
(2)Audit-Related Fees consisted of fees for accounting, consultation services, employee benefit plan audits, services related to due diligence for business transactions, and statutory and regulatory compliance.
(3)Tax Fees consisted of tax compliance and consultation fees.
(4)All Other Fees consisted of a subscription to Ernst & Young LLP’s informational online service.
The Audit Committee has concluded that Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of services that were not related to the audit of our financial statements in 20172020 was compatible with maintaining that firm’s independence from us.
The Audit Committee has established a policy that requires pre-approval of the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditors. Unless a service proposed to be provided by the independent auditors has been pre-approved by the Audit Committee under its pre-approval policies and procedures, it will require specific pre-approval of the engagement terms by the Audit Committee. Under the policy, pre-approved service categories are generally provided for up to 12 months and must be detailed as to the particular services provided and sufficiently specific and objective so that no judgments by management are required to determine whether a specific service falls within the scope of what has been pre-approved. In connection with any pre-approval of services, the independent auditors areAudit Committee is required to provide detailed back-up documentation concerningreview the specificfees and other terms for the services to be provided.provided by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee does not delegate to management any of its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by our independent auditors.
None of the services related to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees or All Other Fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the waiver of pre-approval provisions set forth in applicable rules of the SEC.
The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chairmanchair of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit-related services not prohibited by law to be performed by Ernst & Young LLP, provided that the Chairmanchair is required to report any decisions to pre-approve such audit-related or non-audit-related services and fees to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20192022 ANNUAL MEETING
Any shareholder who wishes to have a qualified proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must send notice of the proposal to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 11911 FM 529, Houston, Texas 77041-3000, so that such notice is received not later than November 29, 2018.26, 2021. If you submit such a proposal, you must provide your name, address, the number of shares of Common Stock held of record or beneficially, the date or dates on which you acquired those shares and documentary support for any claim of beneficial ownership.
In addition, any shareholder who intends to submit a proposal for consideration at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, regardless of whether the proposal is submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement for that meeting, or who intends to submit nominees for election as directors at that meeting, must notify our Corporate Secretary. Under our Bylaws, such notice must:
•be received at our executive offices not earlier than November 5, 20188, 2021 and not later than close of business on January 4, 2019;February 6, 2022; and
•satisfy requirements that our Bylaws specify.
A copy of the pertinent Bylaw provisions can be obtained from our Corporate Secretary on written request.
TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS
Should any other matter requiring the vote of shareholders arise at the meeting, it is intended that proxies will be voted for or against that matter in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.
Please return your proxy as soon as possible. Unless a quorum consisting of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote is represented at the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, no business can be transacted. Therefore, please be sure to date and sign your proxy and return it in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope, or vote via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions included in this package. Please act promptly to ensure that you will be represented at the meeting.
WE WILL PROVIDE WITHOUT CHARGE ON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF ANY PERSON SOLICITED HEREBY A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017.2020. WRITTEN REQUESTS SHOULD BE MAILED TO DAVID K. LAWRENCE, CORPORATE SECRETARY, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC., 11911 FM 529, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77041-3000.
|
| | | | |
| | By Order of the Board of Directors, |
| | |
March 29, 201826, 2021 | | David K. Lawrence
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary |
| | |
| | | | | |
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ATTN: CORPORATE SECRETARY
11911 FARM TO MARKET RD 529
HOUSTON, TX 77041-3011 | VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. You will need to provide the 16-digit identification number that is printed in the box below, marked by the arrow. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OII2021 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. You will need to provide the 16-digit identification number that is printed in the box below, marked by the arrow.
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | |
| TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | |
| D44194-P51445 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
| DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of
the nominees listed: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1. | Election of Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominees: | For | Withhold | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1a. | Karen H. Beachy | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1b. | Deanna L. Goodwin | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1c. | Kavitha Velusamy | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1d. | Steven A. Webster | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following: | | | | | For | Against | Abstain |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote on a resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2021. | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| In their discretion, the proxies referred to herein are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including procedural matters and matters relating to the conduct of the meeting. | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | | | | Signature (Joint Owners) | | Date | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Electronic Voting Instructions
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
InsteadImportant Notice Regarding the Availability of mailing your proxy, you may choose one ofProxy Materials for the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.Annual Meeting:
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. |
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION |
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:00 p.m., Central Time, on May 3, 2018. |
| | | Vote by Internet
• Go to www.investorvote.com/oii
• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
• Follow the steps outlined on the secure Web Site
|
| | | Vote by telephone
• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone
• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message
|
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in
this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
| x
| | | |
|
| | | | |
Annual Meeting Proxy Card | |
| |
| D44195-P51445 |
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET
OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Proposals | |
The | OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 7, 2021 at 8:30 AM Proxy Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors recommendsfor the 2021 Annual Meeting | |
| | |
| Alan R. Curtis and David K. Lawrence, and each of them individually, are hereby appointed as agents and proxies, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote all the shares of common stock of Oceaneering International, Inc. held of record by the undersigned as of the close of business on March 17, 2021, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually via a votelive audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OII2021 on May 7, 2021, at 8:30 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, as indicated on the reverse side hereof. | |
| | |
| The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Oceaneering’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the Notice of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and related Proxy Statement. | |
| | |
| This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed herein. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the director nominees listed: | | | |
1. Election of Directors: | For | Withhold | | |
| 01 | | Deanna L. Goodwin | o | o | | |
| 02 | | John R. Huff | o | o | | |
| 03 | | Steven A. Webster | o | o | | |
| | | | |
named in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. The Board of Directors recommends aproxy holders named above also will vote FOR the following: | For | Against | Abstain | |
2. Advisory vote on a resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. | o | o | o | |
| | | | |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following: | For | Against | Abstain | |
3. Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2018. | o | o | o | |
|
4. Inin their discretion the proxies referred to herein are authorized to vote upon suchon any other business asmatter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including procedural matters and matters relating to the conduct of the meeting. |
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
|
|
Proxy — Oceaneering International, Inc. |
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Proxy Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the 2018 Annual Meeting
W. Cardon Gerner and David K. Lawrence, and each of them individually, are hereby appointed as agents and proxies, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote all the shares of common stock of Oceaneering International, Inc. held of record by the undersigned as of the close of business on March 21, 2018, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 4, 2018, at 8:30 a.m., local time, in the Atrium of our corporate offices at 11911 FM 529, Houston, Texas 77041, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, as indicated on the reverse side hereof.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Oceaneering’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the Notice of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and related Proxy Statement.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed herein. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. The proxy holders named above also will vote in their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.
You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the reverse side. The proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this proxy card or vote by telephone or Internet as described below before the Annual Meeting.
Voting by telephone or Internet eliminates the need to return this proxy card. Your vote authorizes the proxies named on the above to vote your shares to the same extent as if you had marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card. Before voting, you should read the proxy statement and this proxy card in their entirety. Please follow the steps listed on the reverse side. Your vote will be confirmed and posted promptly. Thank you for voting.
|
| |
| Non-Voting Items |
Change of Address — Please print any new address below.
|
| You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the reverse side. The proxies cannot vote the shares unless the proxy card is signed and returned, or voting instructions have been provided by telephone or the Internet as described below before the Annual Meeting. |
|
| |
| Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below |
|
| Voting by telephone or the Internet eliminates the need to return this proxy card. Your vote authorizes the proxies named on the above to vote the shares to the same extent as if you had marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card. Before voting, you should read the proxy statement and this proxy card in their entirety. Please follow the steps listed on the reverse side. Your vote will be confirmed and posted promptly. Thank you for voting. | |
| | |
| Continued and to be signed on reverse side | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | | |
PleaseOCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ATTN: CORPORATE SECRETARY
11911 FARM TO MARKET RD 529
HOUSTON, TX 77041-3011 | VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, the day before the cut-off date of April 29, 2021. Have your voting instruction form in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. You will need to provide the 16-digit identification number that is printed in the box below, marked by the arrow.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, the day before the cut-off date of April 29, 2021. Have your voting instruction form in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. You will need to provide the 16-digit identification number that is printed in the box below, marked by the arrow.
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardianand date your voting instruction form and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or custodian, please give full title.return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. | | | Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. | | | Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. |
/ / | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | |
| D44196-Z79324 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
| DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of
the nominees listed: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1. | Election of Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominees: | For | Withhold | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1a. | Karen H. Beachy | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1b. | Deanna L. Goodwin | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1c. | Kavitha Velusamy | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1d. | Steven A. Webster | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following: | | | | | For | Against | Abstain |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote on a resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2021. | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| In its discretion, the Trustee referred to herein is authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including procedural matters and matters relating to the conduct of the meeting. | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | | | | Signature (Joint Owners) | | Date | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Electronic Voting InstructionsImportant Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your Voting Instruction Form, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to provide your voting instructions.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
|
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION |
Voting instructions submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:00 p.m., Central Time, on April 26, 2018. |
| | | Voting Instructions by Internet
• Go to www.investorvote.com/oii
• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
• Follow the steps outlined on the secure Web Site
|
| | | Voting Instructions by telephone
• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone
• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message
|
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in
this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
| x
| | | |
|
| | | | |
Confidential Voting Instruction Form | |
| |
| D44197-Z79324 |
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET
OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
| | | | | | | |
| Proposals | |
| OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 7, 2021 at 8:30 AM Confidential Voting Instruction Form for 2021 Annual Meeting | |
| | |
| The Boardundersigned participant in the Oceaneering Retirement Investment Plan (the “Plan”) hereby directs Fidelity Management Trust Company, a Massachusetts trust company serving as trustee for the Plan (the “Trustee”), to vote all shares of Directors recommends a vote FOR eachcommon stock of Oceaneering International, Inc. (“Oceaneering”) held in the undersigned’s Plan account of record by the undersigned, as of the nominees listed: | | | |
1. Electionclose of Directors: | For | Withhold | | |
| 01 | | Deanna L. Goodwin | o | o | | |
| 02 | | John R. Huff | o | o | | |
| 03 | | Steven A. Webster | o | o | | |
| | | | |
The Boardbusiness on March 17, 2021, at the Annual Meeting of Directors recommendsShareholders to be held virtually via a vote FOR the following: | For | Against | Abstain | |
2. Advisory votelive audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OII2021 on a resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. | o | o | o | |
| | | | |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following: | For | Against | Abstain | |
3. Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2018. | o | o | o | |
|
4. In its discretion, the Trustee referred to herein is authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting orMay 7, 2021 at 8:30 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, including procedural matters and matters relating toas indicated on the conduct of the meeting. |
IF YOU HAVE NOT PROVIDED YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
|
|
Confidential Voting Instructions — Oceaneering International, Inc. |
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Confidential Voting Instruction Form for 2018 Annual Meeting
The undersigned participant in the Oceaneering Retirement Investment Plan (the “Plan”) hereby directs Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the trustee for the Plan (the “Trustee”), to vote all shares of common stock of Oceaneering International, Inc. held in the undersigned’s Plan account of record by the undersigned, as of the close of business on March 21, 2018, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 4, 2018, at 8:30 a.m., local time, in the Atrium of our corporate offices at 11911 FM 529, Houston, Texas 77041, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, as indicated on the reverse side hereof.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Oceaneering’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the Notice of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and related Proxy Statement.
This Voting Instruction Form, when properly executed and delivered to the Trustee, will provide the Trustee with instructions to vote the shares in your Plan account as of the record date as directed herein. If your Voting Instruction Form is not properly signed or dated or if no direction is provided, the shares in your Plan account as of the record date will be voted in the same proportion as the shares for which the Trustee timely receives valid voting instructions from participants in the Plan. You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the reverse side.
Providing voting instructions by telephone or Internet eliminates the need to return this Voting Instruction Form. Before providing your voting instructions, you should read the proxy statement and Voting Instruction Form. Please follow the steps listed on the reverse side. Your voting instructions will be confirmed and posted promptly. Thank you for participating.
|
| |
| Non-Voting Items |
Change of Address — Please print any new address below.
|
|
|
| |
| Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your voting instructions to be acted upon. — Date and Sign Below |
|
| | |
| The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Oceaneering’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the Notice of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and related Proxy Statement. | |
| | |
Please sign exactly | This Voting Instruction Form, when properly executed and delivered to the Trustee, will provide the Trustee with instructions to vote the shares in your Plan account as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signingof the record date as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardiandirected herein. If your Voting Instruction Form is not properly signed or custodian, please give full title.dated or if no direction is provided, the shares in your Plan account as of the record date will be voted in the same proportion as the shares for which the Trustee timely receives valid voting instructions from participants in the Plan. You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the reverse side. | |
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. | | | Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. | | | Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. |
/ / | Providing voting instructions by telephone or the Internet eliminates the need to return this Voting Instruction Form. Before providing your voting instructions, you should read the proxy statement and Voting Instruction Form. Please follow the steps listed on the reverse side. Your voting instructions will be confirmed and posted promptly. Thank you for participating. | | | | | |
| | |
| Continued and to be signed on reverse side | |
| | |
| | |
